line 46:
cd jre1.$_major.0_0$_minor
that 0 before $_minor should be removed i think?
Search Criteria
Package Details: jre 23.0.1-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | jdk |
Description: | Oracle Java Runtime Environment |
Upstream URL: | https://www.oracle.com/java/ |
Licenses: | LicenseRef-custom |
Conflicts: | jdk |
Provides: | java-runtime, java-runtime-headless, java-runtime-headless-jdk, java-runtime-jdk23, jre23-jdk, jre23-jdk-headless |
Submitter: | td123 |
Maintainer: | dbermond |
Last Packager: | dbermond |
Votes: | 1086 |
Popularity: | 0.105634 |
First Submitted: | 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-16 14:08 (UTC) |
Dependencies (12)
- ca-certificates-utils
- freetype2 (freetype2-qdoledAUR, freetype2-macosAUR, freetype2-gitAUR)
- java-runtime-common
- libx11 (libx11-gitAUR)
- libxext (libxext-gitAUR)
- libxi (libxi-gitAUR)
- libxrender
- libxtst
- python-html2text (make)
- alsa-lib (optional) – for basic sound support
- gtk2 (gtk2-maemoAUR, gtk2-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR) (optional) – for the Gtk+ 2 look and feel - desktop usage
- gtk3 (gtk3-no_deadkeys_underlineAUR, gtk3-classicAUR, gtk3-classic-xfceAUR, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR) (optional) – for the Gtk+ 3 look and feel - desktop usage
Required by (1728)
- 2009scape (requires java-runtime)
- 2009scape-git (requires java-runtime)
- 2p-kt (requires java-runtime)
- abchr (requires java-runtime)
- abcl-git (requires java-runtime)
- abdownloadmanager-bin (requires java-runtime)
- acodec-bin (requires java-runtime)
- acronis-cyber-protect-bin (requires java-runtime)
- activemq (requires java-runtime)
- aechoterm-bin (requires java-runtime)
- ahmyth-bin (requires java-runtime)
- aio-remote (requires java-runtime)
- airsonic (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-advanced-bin (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-advanced-git (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-git (requires java-runtime-headless)
- aladin (requires java-runtime)
- alchemist (requires java-runtime)
- alda (requires java-runtime)
- alda-bin (requires java-runtime)
- Show 1708 more...
Sources (9)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 .. 81 Next › Last »
loxley commented on 2012-12-12 14:26 (UTC)
loxley commented on 2012-12-12 14:03 (UTC)
==> Starting package()...
-> Creating required dirs
/tmp/packerbuild-1000/jre/jre/PKGBUILD: line 46: cd: jre1.7.0_010: No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package().
Aborting...
The build failed.
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-12-12 13:36 (UTC)
there is a typo in PKGBUILD, one zero before $minor
package() {
msg2 "Creating required dirs"
cd jdk1.$_major.0_0$_minor
right version
package() {
msg2 "Creating required dirs"
cd jdk1.$_major.0_$_minor
kyak commented on 2012-12-12 12:28 (UTC)
==> Starting package()...
-> Creating required dirs
/home/user/build/jre/PKGBUILD: line 46: cd: jre1.7.0_010: No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package().
Aborting...
Det commented on 2012-12-04 10:38 (UTC)
It does.
JRE = 'java-runtime', 'java-runtime-headless', 'java-web-start'
JDK = 'java-environment'
I'm providing all these.
kevku commented on 2012-12-04 10:31 (UTC)
Should’nt this also provide jre? Quite a lot of packages seem to directly depend on jre.
Det commented on 2012-12-02 19:28 (UTC)
Again, there are alternative mirrors in the PKGBUILD.
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-12-02 17:42 (UTC)
I get the following error:
ERROR: Failure while downloading jdk-7u9-linux-x64.tar.gz
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build jdk.
It makes no sense... since I've installed another packages from AUR with no problem. Some help will be appreciated.
Cheers.
Det commented on 2012-11-25 15:06 (UTC)
You installed with "-dd" as well, didn't you? These two are in conflict because jdk already provides its own bundled JRE that I had been historically just replacing with this. No longer.
E: No wait, it's the same drop-in replacement bug that was reported as soon as I de-merged the two. I don't really intend doing anything about it because the installation is not supposed to continue, if the conflicting package could not be removed.
Pinned Comments
dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)
As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.