jre6 is instaled in /opt/java6/jre and jre7 (this) is intalled in /opt/java7/jre, right?
in this case, why jre7 (this) conflict w jre6 if both are installed in differents paths????
Search Criteria
Package Details: jre 23-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | jdk |
Description: | Oracle Java Runtime Environment |
Upstream URL: | https://www.oracle.com/java/ |
Licenses: | LicenseRef-custom |
Conflicts: | jdk |
Provides: | java-runtime, java-runtime-headless, java-runtime-headless-jdk, java-runtime-jdk23, jre23-jdk, jre23-jdk-headless |
Submitter: | td123 |
Maintainer: | dbermond |
Last Packager: | dbermond |
Votes: | 1086 |
Popularity: | 0.165403 |
First Submitted: | 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-10-06 02:26 (UTC) |
Dependencies (12)
- ca-certificates-utils
- freetype2 (freetype2-qdoledAUR, freetype2-macosAUR, freetype2-gitAUR)
- java-runtime-common
- libx11 (libx11-gitAUR)
- libxext (libxext-gitAUR)
- libxi (libxi-gitAUR)
- libxrender
- libxtst
- python-html2text (make)
- alsa-lib (optional) – for basic sound support
- gtk2 (gtk2-maemoAUR, gtk2-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR) (optional) – for the Gtk+ 2 look and feel - desktop usage
- gtk3 (gtk3-no_deadkeys_underlineAUR, gtk3-classicAUR, gtk3-classic-xfceAUR, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR) (optional) – for the Gtk+ 3 look and feel - desktop usage
Required by (1728)
- 2009scape (requires java-runtime)
- 2009scape-git (requires java-runtime)
- 2p-kt (requires java-runtime)
- abchr (requires java-runtime)
- abcl-git (requires java-runtime)
- abdownloadmanager-bin (requires java-runtime)
- acodec-bin (requires java-runtime)
- acronis-cyber-protect-bin (requires java-runtime)
- activemq (requires java-runtime)
- aechoterm-bin (requires java-runtime)
- ahmyth-bin (requires java-runtime)
- aio-remote (requires java-runtime)
- airsonic (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-advanced-bin (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-advanced-git (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-git (requires java-runtime-headless)
- aladin (requires java-runtime)
- alchemist (requires java-runtime)
- alda (requires java-runtime)
- alda-bin (requires java-runtime)
- Show 1708 more...
Sources (9)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 .. 81 Next › Last »
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-05-07 02:27 (UTC)
Det commented on 2012-05-04 11:54 (UTC)
So I guess this is a 'left' issue for my part, eh?:
┌┌(det@Archlinux)┌(424/pts/0)┌(01:12pm:05/04/12)┌-
└┌(%:~)┌- ls -l /usr/share/applications/java-monitoring-and-management-console.desktop
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 168 May 4 10:31 /usr/share/applications/java-monitoring-and-management-console.desktop
I don't know what's wrong with your system (or the build for that matter) because I still can't reproduce that here, but updated anyway.
Also you don't need to use the word 'please', as long as it's something sane you're asking.
seblu commented on 2012-05-04 09:58 (UTC)
Right issues:
$ ll /usr/share/applications/java-monitoring-and-management-console.desktop
-rw------- 1 root root 168 2012-05-03 16:15 /usr/share/applications/java-monitoring-and-management-console.desktop
please use install with right in your PKGBUILD instead of cp
Det commented on 2012-05-02 12:56 (UTC)
The http://uni-smr.ac.ru guys have caught up.
Det commented on 2012-05-02 12:56 (UTC)
The http://uni-smr.ac.ru guys have caught up.
Det commented on 2012-05-01 18:39 (UTC)
Sigh. The bloody download isn't this way because I wanna respect Oracle.
It's this way because _there is no other way_.
nickoe commented on 2012-05-01 15:31 (UTC)
Where in the license does oracle state that the user has to download it directly and manually accepting the license? http://java.com/license
sjakub commented on 2012-04-30 20:13 (UTC)
I just tried both jre and jdk on a machine that was not updated yet. There were no problems, and the process is actually really nice.
The loop was indeed a great idea and it works awesome. Thank you and keep up the good work! :)
(As a side note, I can't believe how arrogant company Oracle is :/ )
Det commented on 2012-04-30 14:37 (UTC)
That's the spirit. You're welcome.
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-04-30 01:55 (UTC)
Working well now. Thanks for the fast fix! :)
~Eric
Pinned Comments
dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)
As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.