Search Criteria
Package Details: labelle 1.3.2-2
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/labelle.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | labelle |
Description: | Linux Software to print with LabelManager PnP from Dymo |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/labelle-org/labelle |
Licenses: | Apache-2.0 |
Replaces: | dymoprint |
Submitter: | Auerhuhn |
Maintainer: | Auerhuhn |
Last Packager: | Auerhuhn |
Votes: | 1 |
Popularity: | 0.37 |
First Submitted: | 2024-04-29 17:56 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-12-22 17:27 (UTC) |
Dependencies (24)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR)
- python-barcodeAUR (python-barcode-gitAUR, python-barcodeAUR)
- python-darkdetect
- python-pillow (python-pillow-simd-gitAUR)
- python-platformdirs
- python-pyqrcode
- python-pyqt6 (python-pyqt6-pre-releaseAUR)
- python-pyusb (python-pyusb-gitAUR)
- python-rich
- python-typer
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- python-build (make)
- python-hatch-fancy-pypi-readme (make)
- python-hatch-vcs (make)
- python-hatchling (python-hatchling-gitAUR) (make)
- python-installer (make)
- python-pip (make)
- python-setuptools (make)
- python-setuptools-scm (make)
- at-spi2-core (at-spi2-core-gitAUR) (check)
- Show 4 more dependencies...
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
Auerhuhn commented on 2025-02-17 22:10 (UTC)
@systemofapwne Thanks for following up. If you ever happen to find a fix, I’ll be happy to include it. Until then, feel free to skip
check
if it’s not helpful for you!systemofapwne commented on 2025-02-17 21:42 (UTC) (edited on 2025-02-17 21:43 (UTC) by systemofapwne)
@Auerhuhn I can understand. I still regret my 6 years old choice on this specific machine.
Anyhow: I traced down the bug to issues with dbus. Specifically mounting "/run/user/1000/doc" for testing pre-build via pytest. It first looked like this issue https://github.com/labelle-org/labelle/issues/87 , but that was already fixed according to the labelle devs.
If I see this correctly, the check() function has been introduced only about 4 months ago in the PKGBUILD. After removing it, labelle just built without any issues and is running as expected.
Auerhuhn commented on 2025-02-14 08:18 (UTC)
@systemofapwne Sorry, I can’t help with Manjaro.
systemofapwne commented on 2025-02-13 23:41 (UTC) (edited on 2025-02-13 23:42 (UTC) by systemofapwne)
I see the same issue as @spease But I have to be clear here: I am on Manjaro (which is shitty in terms of keeping up with base Arch). System is up-to-date (what Manjaro maintainers define as up-to-date) and no broken python dependencies (checked it with
checkrebuild
)simona commented on 2025-01-22 18:00 (UTC)
solved. thx.
simona commented on 2025-01-04 12:04 (UTC)
Thx. Tried –rebuildtree but no change. Thanks for trying.
Auerhuhn commented on 2025-01-04 11:40 (UTC)
@simona There seems to be a misunderstanding of what yay can do and what it can’t do. One would expect that yay should be smart enough to always do the right thing and always rebuild your Python packages properly, but in reality AUR helpers are nowhere near that smart. (The fact that most PKGBUILD maintainers never bother doing annual courtesy pkgrel bumps is also not exactly helpful.)
That’s why your expectation is unrealistic, and you’re going to have to either a) rebuild your dependency hierarchy yourself, or b) use the
--rebuildtree
option to have yay do it for you.But there’s absolutely no way for
yay -Syu
to always work reliably in the face of a minor Python version upgrade.And there’s nothing the labelle PKGBUILD can possibly do about it.
AUR helpers are not nearly as smart as you think they are. That’s why I suggested to install
checkrebuild
, becausecheckrebuild
is that smart, and will warn you about the issue every time it happens.simona commented on 2025-01-04 10:31 (UTC)
you can't have to fumble with updating a single aur package specifically. it's fine for testing, but in the end a simple "yay -Syu" has to work
Auerhuhn commented on 2025-01-04 10:25 (UTC)
@spease I tried several times both on my development machine and in a clean chroot, but I can’t reproduce.
Does the build work in a clean chroot for you?
spease commented on 2025-01-02 07:21 (UTC) (edited on 2025-01-02 07:22 (UTC) by spease)
Getting the following error:
I have attempted running checkrebuild and updated all the dependencies it recommended.
1 2 3 Next › Last »