Package Details: linux-ck-headers 6.11.10-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: Headers and scripts for building modules for Linux-ck kernel
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.26
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-26 13:15 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 .. 308 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2012-01-09 20:45 (UTC)

@Huulivoide - This is temporarily true. In the past, users have complained that they would rather have the latest upstream code + bfs or ck1. This was particularly true when the 2.6.x series --> 3.0 series. I believe it took 5-6 weeks of Paolo to update the BFQ source tree. I am acting as though this same tempo is desired by the community moving forward, hence the 3.2 series as-is. I know I won't make 100 % of the people happy, but I try to appease the majority -- or at least the majority of those who ask for it. Please make use of the AUR.git to get the 3.1.7 version of this package which you can easily update to 3.1.8. Please let me know if I can be of assistance. http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur.git/log/linux-ck

Huulivoide commented on 2012-01-09 20:36 (UTC)

Why in the earth did you update this to 3.2???????????? Now this isin't -ck kernel anymore, this is linux-bfs now.

snack commented on 2012-01-08 22:23 (UTC)

Wow, didn't know about the changelog! Thanks a lot!

graysky commented on 2012-01-08 21:35 (UTC)

@snack - see the changelog, you're doing nothing wrong: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog

snack commented on 2012-01-08 21:03 (UTC)

After update to 3.2-2 I lost the bfq scheduler: # cat /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler noop deadline [cfq] With previous version I used to enable it with the kernel option elevator=bfq. Has this feature been removed from linux-ck or maybe I am doing something wrong? Thanks.

graysky commented on 2012-01-08 16:58 (UTC)

@snack - np, always trying to give the community what it wants :)

snack commented on 2012-01-08 16:14 (UTC)

Thank you graysky for your explanation.

graysky commented on 2012-01-08 16:13 (UTC)

@snack - I try to follow the upstream release cycle since users have requested this behavior. I keep the repo in sync with the AUR to avoid conflicts with packages that I don't keep in the repo, particularly nvidia-beta-ck and lirc-ck.

snack commented on 2012-01-08 16:04 (UTC)

I would suggest to not update [repo-ck] with newest kernel versions until they hit also official repos. Or perhaps there's a rationale behind this behavior, eg., [repo-ck] has to be considered as a testing repo? Thanks.

maddien commented on 2012-01-08 10:36 (UTC)

@graysky unfortunately I can't. linux-ck fails to boot now claiming it can't find my root partition. However, now the stock kernel has the same problem with my audigy, so I guess the problem is not with your package. Thanks for your work providing me a patch anyway!

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 .. 308 Next › Last »