Package Details: linux-ck-headers 6.11.10-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: Headers and scripts for building modules for Linux-ck kernel
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.20
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-26 13:15 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 308 Next › Last »

<deleted-account> commented on 2023-02-19 20:40 (UTC)

I think bison should be specified as make dependency:

Hunk #1 succeeded at 95 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1639 (offset 3 lines).
patching file kernel/time/clockevents.c
patching file kernel/time/hrtimer.c
  YACC    scripts/kconfig/parser.tab.[ch]
/bin/sh: line 1: bison: command not found
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.host:17: scripts/kconfig/parser.tab.h] Error 127
make: *** [Makefile:697: olddefconfig] Error 2
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in prepare().
    Aborting...

VGrol commented on 2022-12-05 03:43 (UTC)

I've been tinkering with some custom patches for this package, but what would be the best way to automate the build process, in particular; How do I prevent the half a dozen prompts for drivers, like (GPIO_BT8XX)?

I'm a bit of a novice when it comes to this, so some help would be appreciated!

brunomiguel commented on 2022-12-04 22:16 (UTC)

I appreciate your feedback, and I'll look into the snippet you shared so I can integrate it into my build system. Thank you!! 😊

graysky commented on 2022-12-04 21:17 (UTC)

What you're proposing is too non-standard for most other users IMO. If you can tweak your build script that would be preferable for your edge use case.

For my build script, the strategy is to first make the set of PKGBUILD files needed for the 4 subarches then copy them into a working dir to build. You might try something like that.

makework() {
  TODO="$des/TODO"
  if [[ ! -d "$TODO" ]]; then
    mkdir -p "$TODO" || exit 1
  fi

  cp "$pkg_source/PKGBUILD" "$TODO" || exit 1

  for i in "${buildem[@]}"; do
    if [[ "$i" = "generic" ]]; then
      # generic setup where 36 is the default
      num=36
      # this hit both instances of 'make oldconfig' for they are in an if statement so doesnt matter
      sed -e s/"#groups=('ck-generic')"/"groups=('ck-generic')"/ \
        -e "s/_subarch=/_subarch=36/" <"$TODO/PKGBUILD" >"$TODO/PKGBUILD.$i"
        #-e "s/make oldconfig/yes $num | make oldconfig/g" <"$TODO/PKGBUILD" >"$TODO/PKGBUILD.$i"
            else
              # not generic so everything else
              # num refers to the number added by my gcc patch assuming x86_64's list
              case $i in
                generic-v2)
                  num=37
                  ;;
                generic-v3)
                  num=38
                  ;;
                generic-v4)
                  num=39
                  ;;
                *) exit 0
                  ;;
              esac

              sed -e s"/#groups=('ck-generic')"/"groups=('ck-generic')"/ \
                -e "/^pkgbase=/ s,linux-ck,linux-ck-$i," \
                -e "/depends=('linux-ck'/ s,ck,ck-$i," \
                -e "s/groups=('ck-generic')"/"groups=('ck-$i')"/ \
                -e "s/_subarch=/_subarch=$num/" \
                <"$TODO/PKGBUILD" >"$TODO/PKGBUILD.$i"
    fi
  done

  # only work with PKGBUILD.xxx
  rm -f "$TODO/PKGBUILD"
}

brunomiguel commented on 2022-12-04 20:53 (UTC)

Editing the file makes it harder for automated builds, and it's trivial to add those entries as environment variables on the PKGBUILD. I understand you are not obligated to do so; you have it this way, and anyone who wants it differently can fork it, just like with any other FOSS project.

To make it easy for automated builds, would you be willing to use environment variables on the PKGBUILD to choose the sub-architecture and the compiler?

Thank you for creating the PKGBUILD for this kernel 🤝

artafinde commented on 2022-12-04 09:49 (UTC)

graysky: after the change for resolve_btfids issue below can you build the generic in a clean chroot?

graysky commented on 2022-12-04 09:38 (UTC)

Works fine as-is for me. Edit the PKGBUILD defining a valid number for _subarch= and build

brunomiguel commented on 2022-12-03 18:23 (UTC) (edited on 2022-12-03 19:26 (UTC) by brunomiguel)

Could you enable passing the _subarch variable with a value to the build process? I've been trying to pass it, either exporting it beforehand or using the env command, but it always requires user input. This prevents me from automating the build process for this kernel.

A way to fix it is changing _subarch= to "${_subarch:=""}" when first declaring it.

graysky commented on 2022-12-01 08:01 (UTC)

Fixed in -3