Search Criteria
Package Details: microchip-mplabx-bin 6.20-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/microchip-mplabx-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | microchip-mplabx-bin |
Description: | IDE for Microchip PIC and dsPIC development |
Upstream URL: | http://www.microchip.com/mplabx |
Licenses: | custom |
Conflicts: | mplab |
Provides: | mplab |
Submitter: | bxs |
Maintainer: | mickael9 (danwood76) |
Last Packager: | mickael9 |
Votes: | 57 |
Popularity: | 0.000729 |
First Submitted: | 2011-12-17 04:28 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-02-04 15:45 (UTC) |
Dependencies (13)
- alsa-lib
- gtk2 (gtk2-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR, gtk2-maemoAUR)
- java8-openjfxAUR
- jre8-openjdk
- libxslt (libxslt-gitAUR)
- libxtst
- desktop-file-utils (desktop-file-utils-gitAUR) (make)
- fakechroot (fakechroot-gitAUR) (make)
- microchip-mplabc18-bin (optional) – C compiler for PIC18 MCUs
- microchip-mplabxc16-binAUR (optional) – C compiler for PIC24 MCUs and dsPIC DSCs
- microchip-mplabxc32-binAUR (optional) – C Compiler for PIC32 MCUs
- microchip-mplabxc8-binAUR (optional) – C compiler for PIC10 PIC12 PIC16 PIC18 MCUs
- sdcc (sdcc-svnAUR) (optional) – C compiler for PIC16/18 MCUs
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 30 Next › Last »
Veraxis commented on 2023-09-10 17:14 (UTC) (edited on 2023-09-10 17:21 (UTC) by Veraxis)
I have been having difficulty installing this. I get the following:
Extracting installers...
Running MPLABX installer...
Problem running post-install step. Installation may not complete correctly
Error running tar xzf /opt/microchip/mplabx/v6.15/sys/java/jre-zulu
linux_x64.tar.gz -C "/opt/microchip/mplabx/v6.15/sys/java" --no-same-owner: /bin/sh:
line 1: tar: command not found
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package().
-> error making: microchip-mplabx-bin-exit status 4
-> Failed to install the following packages. Manual intervention is required:
microchip-mplabx-bin - exit status 4
Has anyone else been having issues with this? Apologies as I am not very experienced with debugging these things.
mauzil commented on 2023-09-06 13:58 (UTC)
Could be possible to make one package for MPLAB IDE and another with MPLAB IPE?
danwood76 commented on 2023-07-29 17:23 (UTC)
You probably need to set the harmony directory in the application preferences.
To be honest the downloader sucks on either platform. I just use git directly to pull them in.
All this info is on the microchip wiki.
imeguras commented on 2023-07-29 10:27 (UTC) (edited on 2023-07-29 10:28 (UTC) by imeguras)
Im very new to mplab as a whole but seeing what my experienced colleague is doing on windows i seem to run into an exception when clicking mcc content manager and then clicking select MPLAB HARMONY and later finish:
Whats missing?
danwood76 commented on 2023-05-31 08:50 (UTC)
@siavoshkc
I have removed these 32-bit dependencies in the latest version of the PKGBUILD with no ill effects. These must have been required by an older version of the installer.
siavoshkc commented on 2023-05-28 11:57 (UTC)
Actually I installed both IDE and compiler via original Linux installer with no problem. So 32bit dependencies are definitely redundant.
danwood76 commented on 2023-05-27 15:00 (UTC)
@siavoshkc mplabx always had 32-bit dependencies so without the 32-bit libs things like debuggers may not work. I can check the latest version when I package it up.
@schrmh not really sure what your issue is, none of the udev rules mention uaccess.
siavoshkc commented on 2023-05-27 10:42 (UTC)
Can we exclude 32 bit dependencies in case we don't want any cross compilation on x64 system? This is to avoid enabling multilib repo.
lib32-fakechroot (make, x86_64) lib32-fakeroot (make, x86_64)
schrmh commented on 2023-01-15 13:13 (UTC)
Would be nice if it the 98-jlink-mplabx.rules udev rule would be fixed. Problem like this: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=274415
s.f commented on 2022-08-24 09:18 (UTC)
Awesome, thanks.
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 30 Next › Last »