Search Criteria
Package Details: mkmm 0.4.0-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/mkmm.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | mkmm |
Description: | Moviuro's Kernel Module Manager |
Upstream URL: | https://git.sr.ht/~moviuro/mkmm |
Licenses: | MIT |
Submitter: | Moviuro |
Maintainer: | Moviuro |
Last Packager: | Moviuro |
Votes: | 9 |
Popularity: | 0.000556 |
First Submitted: | 2021-06-08 12:24 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-03-11 15:01 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
JisuWoniu commented on 2024-12-23 02:20 (UTC)
It seems that the problem is in
/var/lib/dkms
. After I remove all files & directories with version numbers 6.6.5* and 6.11.9 in them, the problem is gone.But do I have to run the "find and remove" commands every time I upgrade the kernel? Or is there a way to automatically get it done?
Moviuro commented on 2024-12-22 16:37 (UTC)
@JisuWoniu : looks like you have lots of stray directories. During normal operation, you should at most have one extra modules' dir (the one that contains the current kernel's modules). Inspect them and remove (
rm -rf
) the ones that are unnecessary:Also check
/usr/lib/mkmm
- there should be only one dir in it. Trymkmm bleach
.JisuWoniu commented on 2024-12-22 15:56 (UTC)
When I run
dkms status
, I got this error in my terminal:How can I fix it?
Moviuro commented on 2024-03-13 08:00 (UTC)
@liljaylj -- this sadly sounds like a git(1) issue, but it is indeed repeatable:
03A5D629F62B7AE323A753E0D280BD7ACDF8CE52
valid from 2022-10-26T15:15:15Z until 2024-01-01T15:15:15Z)Also, slight issue within the error message (
%s
).I will reach out to git(1) devs and pacman(8) devs to discuss this.
flying-sheep commented on 2024-03-12 12:57 (UTC)
yup, key error is back
liljaylj commented on 2024-03-12 06:01 (UTC) (edited on 2024-03-12 06:01 (UTC) by liljaylj)
@Moviuro, hello. i have problem building this package with makepkg.
can only build with
--skippgpcheck
flageNV25 commented on 2022-12-22 21:27 (UTC)
@Moviuro
True,
pacman -Qo
is a fine alternative. I guess nothing needs to change.I don't think any files other than
*.ko
are useful. Isn't the whole point of this, for the dynamic loading of modules to continue to work after an update?Moviuro commented on 2022-12-22 20:53 (UTC)
@eNV25:
pacman -Qo
will tell you that no package owns the directory. I have not found documentation about thepkgbase
file in/usr/lib/modules/*/
; and it's unclear how that removal might interfere with other pieces of software (dkms?...)eNV25 commented on 2022-12-22 13:36 (UTC)
An indicator that restored kernels are not from pacman would be useful. The pkgbase file could be removed, for example.
whynothugo commented on 2021-08-24 12:19 (UTC)
git
is missing as a build dependency:1 2 3 Next › Last »