Package Details: mkmm 0.4.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/mkmm.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: mkmm
Description: Moviuro's Kernel Module Manager
Upstream URL: https://git.sr.ht/~moviuro/mkmm
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: Moviuro
Maintainer: Moviuro
Last Packager: Moviuro
Votes: 9
Popularity: 0.072103
First Submitted: 2021-06-08 12:24 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-03-11 15:01 (UTC)

Dependencies (1)

Required by (0)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

Moviuro commented on 2024-03-13 08:00 (UTC)

@liljaylj -- this sadly sounds like a git(1) issue, but it is indeed repeatable:

% git tag -v 0.4.0
object 1e7f5fe4f3439d50d68e53fa17a86e98a93a4738
type commit
tag 0.4.0
tagger Moviuro <moviuro+git@gmail.com> 1685094977 +0200

Breaking change: mkmm will no longer remove directories that were not marked as managed by mkmm
gpg: Signature made 2023-05-26T11:56:51 CEST
gpg:                using EDDSA key 03A5D629F62B7AE323A753E0D280BD7ACDF8CE52
[...]
gpg: Note: This key has expired!
Primary key fingerprint: 2CD9 6FEE 343C 6799 B9CE  AFAD 6200 9A2E 0C22 D9AB
     Subkey fingerprint: 03A5 D629 F62B 7AE3 23A7  53E0 D280 BD7A CDF8 CE52
% echo $?
1
  • The tag was created in May 2023, and signed with my then yearly subkey (03A5D629F62B7AE323A753E0D280BD7ACDF8CE52 valid from 2022-10-26T15:15:15Z until 2024-01-01T15:15:15Z)
  • GnuPG considers artifacts signed before the expiration of the key to be valid: this tag should be valid.

Also, slight issue within the error message (%s).

I will reach out to git(1) devs and pacman(8) devs to discuss this.

flying-sheep commented on 2024-03-12 12:57 (UTC)

yup, key error is back

liljaylj commented on 2024-03-12 06:01 (UTC) (edited on 2024-03-12 06:01 (UTC) by liljaylj)

@Moviuro, hello. i have problem building this package with makepkg.

==> Making package: mkmm 0.4.0-1 (Tue Mar 12 10:59:25 2024)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
  -> Updating mkmm git repo...
  -> Found mkmm.install
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    mkmm ... Skipped
    mkmm.install ... Passed
==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
    mkmm git repo ... %s is unable to verify the signature.
git
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!

can only build with --skippgpcheck flag

eNV25 commented on 2022-12-22 21:27 (UTC)

@Moviuro

pacman -Qo will tell you that no package owns the directory.

True, pacman -Qo is a fine alternative. I guess nothing needs to change.

I have not found documentation about the pkgbase file in /usr/lib/modules/*/; and it's unclear how that removal might interfere with other pieces of software (dkms?...)

I don't think any files other than *.ko are useful. Isn't the whole point of this, for the dynamic loading of modules to continue to work after an update?

Moviuro commented on 2022-12-22 20:53 (UTC)

@eNV25: pacman -Qo will tell you that no package owns the directory. I have not found documentation about the pkgbase file in /usr/lib/modules/*/; and it's unclear how that removal might interfere with other pieces of software (dkms?...)

eNV25 commented on 2022-12-22 13:36 (UTC)

An indicator that restored kernels are not from pacman would be useful. The pkgbase file could be removed, for example.

whynothugo commented on 2021-08-24 12:19 (UTC)

git is missing as a build dependency:

diff --git a/PKGBUILD b/PKGBUILD
index d0bbec0..1eaf953 100644
--- a/PKGBUILD
+++ b/PKGBUILD
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ arch=('any')
 license=('MIT')
 url="https://git.sr.ht/~moviuro/${pkgname}"
 install="${pkgname}.install"
+makedepends=('git')
 validpgpkeys=('2CD96FEE343C6799B9CEAFAD62009A2E0C22D9AB')
 # https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x62009A2E0C22D9AB
 source=("git+${url}?signed#tag=${pkgver}"

KdU7aq commented on 2021-08-10 11:12 (UTC)

@eNV25

Indeed, problem solved with 0.2.0-2.

eNV25 commented on 2021-08-10 06:14 (UTC)

The issue isn't with gpg. It's that the second checksum is outdated. You need to run updpkgsums.

KdU7aq commented on 2021-08-09 16:52 (UTC)

@Moviuro

Same error after adding the key with 

% gpg --keyserver https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/ --search-keys 62009A2E0C22D9AB

I also tried saving the content of both links you mentioned to different files and adding the keys with

% gpg --import gpg_key

gpg: key 62009A2E0C22D9AB: 1 signature not checked due to a missing key
gpg: key 62009A2E0C22D9AB: public key "Moviuro (Our life is the immortals' death.) <moviuro@gmail.com>" imported
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:               imported: 1
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found

While the key is successfully imported with both files, the error persists. Not sure what's going on either.

1 2 Next › Last »