Arch Linux User Repository

Please note the following additions:

# Bug reports can be filed at https://bugs.square-r00t.net/index.php?project=3
# News updates for packages can be followed at https://devblog.square-r00t.net

(If you want an RSS-feed only pertaining to my AUR packages, you can subscribe to https://devblog.square-r00t.net/rss/?category=aur in your favourite RSS reader.)

Note that you should still use the AUR web interface for flagging packages as out-of-date if a new version is released; the aforementioned bug tracker is to aid in issues with building/packaging/the PKGBUILD formats/etc. specifically.

Thanks!

Hi,

i keep getting a build error after the latest update:

make[2]: Leaving directory '/tmp/yaourt-tmp-user/aur-mondo/src/mondo-3.2.2/test' make[2]: Entering directory '/tmp/yaourt-tmp-user/aur-mondo/src/mondo-3.2.2' make[2]: No rule to make target 'docs/man/mondoarchive.8', needed by 'all-am'. Stop. make[2]: Leaving directory '/tmp/yaourt-tmp-user/aur-mondo/src/mondo-3.2.2' make[1]: [Makefile:480: all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/yaourt-tmp-user/aur-mondo/src/mondo-3.2.2' make: *** [Makefile:371: all] Error 2 ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package(). Aborting... ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build mondo.

Looks like line 3 is the most striking one.

Any idea?

Cheers

just realized i never replied to this. thanks, aexoxea. i avoid star because at the time i tested it, the package (star) did not build/was broken and afio did work. that may have changed in the interim, but afio seems to have built cleanly each time. i think afio may be more active than star but i'm not 100% on that.

Just for information: I note a comment, ostensibly from the Mondo Rescue lead developer, on the Fedora bug tracker which suggests that 'star' can be used in place of 'afio'[1]. I take that comment to mean that it is required to have 'afio' or 'star', but not required to have both.

'star' is packaged in AUR[2], although not having used Mondo Rescue for some time and never with 'star', I can't vouch for how well it works. As I haven't been actively using the package, I also have no comment on whether the PKGBUILD should be updated or not.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318#c63
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/star/

first off, that's for mindi-busybox. not mondo. the PKGBUILD for this package does not fetch that file.

secondly, it WAS up in the interim; that comment is nearly 5 months old ([0], [1]). it's currently down (again). try again in a bit; their downloads occasionally go down.

EDIT: looks like their whole site is down. box is probably either down for maintenance or under a DDoS is my guess. i've emailed the admin again.

[0] https://devblog.square-r00t.net/articles/mondo-mindi-mindi-busybox-fetching-issues
[1] https://devblog.square-r00t.net/articles/mondo-mindi-mindi-busybox-fetching-resolved

yes the ftp is still down

==> ERROR: Failure while downloading ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/src/mindi-busybox-1.18.5.tar.gz
Aborting...

just a heads up, the site (and FTP) seem to be down. i've sent an email to the administrative contact to see what's up.

Please note the following additions:

# Bug reports can be filed at https://bugs.square-r00t.net/index.php?project=3
# News updates for packages can be followed at https://devblog.square-r00t.net

(If you want an RSS-feed only pertaining to my AUR packages, you can subscribe to https://devblog.square-r00t.net/rss/?category=aur in your favourite RSS reader.)

Note that you should still use the AUR web interface for flagging packages as out-of-date if a new version is released; the aforementioned bug tracker is to aid in issues with building/packaging/the PKGBUILD formats/etc. specifically.

Thanks!

updated to 3.2.0 - thanks for the notification, gardar!