Package Details: nvidia-340xx-dkms 340.108-37

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-340xx.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: nvidia-340xx
Description: NVIDIA driver sources for linux, 340xx legacy branch
Upstream URL: https://www.nvidia.com/
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: nvidia, nvidia-340xx
Provides: nvidia-340xx
Submitter: simonsmh
Maintainer: JerryXiao
Last Packager: JerryXiao
Votes: 70
Popularity: 0.140561
First Submitted: 2019-06-07 10:29 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-10 16:52 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

JerryXiao commented on 2022-10-13 03:51 (UTC) (edited on 2022-10-14 02:44 (UTC) by JerryXiao)

For testing users, contributors: check out https://github.com/archlinux-jerry/nvidia-340xx
Warning: force push may happen to match the aur tree

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 56 Next › Last »

bigjuck commented on 2022-08-23 08:15 (UTC)

Runs fine on kernel 5.15.62-1-lts after dkms remove and dkms install

infarni commented on 2022-08-17 14:34 (UTC)

@Musikolo, Thanks, I didn't know if I should update

Musikolo commented on 2022-08-17 13:52 (UTC)

@infarni, I built it and use it yesterday on an old computer I have. It worked perfectly for me with kernel 5.19.

I hope it helps.

infarni commented on 2022-08-17 13:48 (UTC)

Does this package work fine on kernel version 5.19?

loy commented on 2022-07-23 12:04 (UTC) (edited on 2022-07-23 12:39 (UTC) by loy)

Cannot install nvidia-340xx-dkms : First need to run it as " IGNORE_CC_MISMATCH=1 dkms install --no-depmod nvidia/340.108 -k 5.18.13-arch1-1 " Because of comparison btw GCC and CC (same versions) Next, into /var/lib/dkms/nvidia/340.108/source/ need to patch os-interface.h and nv.h to modify include of stdarg.h to linux/stdarg.h Then I figure out that patches are not applied into this directory (or I do not understand why they are here ^^) so I had a lot of errors. I stopped here, build nvidia-340xx, call manually dkms install to ignore CC mismatch, and it's installed properly. Now I have to reboot... Hope it works ! EDIT : finally forcing re-install of nvidia-340xx (it said installed but keep -dkms in place, maybe a mistake of I), works fine :)

ViGA-FR commented on 2022-07-09 09:55 (UTC) (edited on 2022-07-09 10:21 (UTC) by ViGA-FR)

Hi,

Doesn't work on my PC using mobo Gigabyte GA-E7AUM-DS2H (IGPU 9400), when I start gdm it generates watchdog soft lockup cpu stuck

alexzk commented on 2022-07-02 14:21 (UTC)

@JerryXiao well, kernel says "PCI: Using host bridge windows from ACPI; if necessary, use "pci=nocrs" and report a bug" on boot, yes. It is laptop, so no cables - direct connection, triple checked, cleansed by alcohol etc. On heavy drive access like "pacman -Qs nvidia" it starts to print "broken inode" if nvidia driver installed.

JerryXiao commented on 2022-06-16 13:50 (UTC) (edited on 2022-06-16 13:54 (UTC) by JerryXiao)

@sebalis I believe user should have the freedom to choose their own C compiler in makepkg.conf. I wouldn't override their preference unless it has to be done. Fixing the warning is a good thing, but we should try fixing the compiler version comparison code instead.
Also structleak_plugin of gcc would have blocked the compilation in case of a compiler version mismatch, so that check seems redundant. Maybe we can remove it entirely.

sebalis commented on 2022-06-16 11:34 (UTC) (edited on 2022-06-16 11:37 (UTC) by sebalis)

@JerryXiao When I build the package, I get the following message twice:

warning: the compiler differs from the one used to build the kernel
The kernel was built by: gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
You are using: cc (GCC) 12.1.0

This occurs shortly after the lines

make[1]: Entering directory '/usr/lib/modules/5.18.3-arch1-1/build'

and

make[1]: Entering directory '/usr/lib/modules/5.18.3-arch1-1/build'

The only lines before the warning are echos of commands that are about to be executed.

At one point in the past there was a subsequent message during the installation process that a command had returned a non-zero exit status. I couldn’t reproduce that command when I tried just now.

However, it would still be a good thing in my view to remove this warning as it might cause uncertainty. Also I’m wondering if the issue could be more serious for users that might have an alternative C compilers installed.

JerryXiao commented on 2022-06-16 10:52 (UTC) (edited on 2022-06-16 10:53 (UTC) by JerryXiao)

@sebalis I don't see any issue with the current PKGBUILD. Tested on real hardware.
@dmanlfc no log, so no solution.
@alexzk ACPI bug? ACPI is working fine on my hardware. TBH how could an acpi bug corrupt your SSD? Do you have a bad sata cable or have you undervolted your CPU?