do not work with dotnet-sdk-bin in my case. I had this message :
Install the [7.0.100-preview.4.22252.9] .NET Core SDK or update
I resolved it by installing dotnet-sdk-preview-bin.
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/omnisharp-roslyn.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | omnisharp-roslyn |
Description: | OmniSharp server (STDIO) based on Roslyn workspaces |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn |
Keywords: | csharp dotnet dotnet-sdk omnisharp roslyn |
Licenses: | MIT |
Submitter: | sixpindin |
Maintainer: | oscarcl |
Last Packager: | oscarcl |
Votes: | 14 |
Popularity: | 0.175444 |
First Submitted: | 2016-08-25 21:14 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-07-25 23:29 (UTC) |
do not work with dotnet-sdk-bin in my case. I had this message :
Install the [7.0.100-preview.4.22252.9] .NET Core SDK or update
I resolved it by installing dotnet-sdk-preview-bin.
Lines 44 and 45 have licenses spelled wrong, sending it to an incorrect folder. It's currently licences when it should be licenses.
we really need an update
This needs an update, doesnt pass validitiy check.
Since this package doesn't build from source it should be moved to a package with -bin suffix.
Omnisharp releases have evolved beyond where 'omnisharp-roslyn' could be a reasonable name for a PKGBUILD. There are now quite a few different builds and I imagine it would be best to have appropriately named PKGBUILDS for each of them. Therefore I'm disowning the package.
Any chance of a second package that downloads the http version of omnisharp-roslyn instead of the stdio version? PKGBUILD would essentially be the same with the exception of downloading "omnisharp.http-mono.tar.gz" instead of "omnisharp-mono.tar.gz" and updating the MD5 hash for the alternate file.
Pinned Comments