Package Details: openblas-lapack 0.3.29-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/openblas-lapack.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: openblas-lapack
Description: Optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2 1.13 BSD (providing blas, lapack, and cblas)
Upstream URL: http://www.openblas.net/
Licenses: BSD
Conflicts: blas, cblas, lapack, lapacke, openblas
Provides: blas, cblas, lapack, lapacke, openblas
Submitter: sftrytry
Maintainer: thrasibule
Last Packager: thrasibule
Votes: 92
Popularity: 0.000645
First Submitted: 2013-11-20 23:53 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-13 18:13 (UTC)

Required by (641)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next › Last »

Rufflewind commented on 2015-06-04 00:48 (UTC)

USE_THREAD=0, why? Doesn't that force OpenBLAS to be single-threaded?

hllowrld commented on 2015-02-26 22:28 (UTC)

I think there's a problem with the url: You want: https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/archive/v0.2.13.tar.gz but currently the build has: http://xianyi.github.com/OpenBLAS/archive/v0.2.13.tar.gz

eolianoe commented on 2015-02-25 21:47 (UTC)

Adopted, I will provide an updated PKGBUILB by the end of the week (no acces to an Arch machine for few days).

aphirst commented on 2015-02-16 13:20 (UTC)

0.2.13 has been out for a while now. :) https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/releases/tag/v0.2.13

SuperBo commented on 2015-02-02 09:24 (UTC)

:: failed to verify openblas-lapack integrity

aphirst commented on 2014-07-05 19:25 (UTC)

Ah, false alarm. I ran it again, giving it a bit more time, and eventually it did successfully complete.

aphirst commented on 2014-07-05 17:28 (UTC)

When I try to build this, I get a seemingly endless hang with 100% CPU usage at the following lines, which I think are some sort of build test: rm -f ?BLAT3.SUMM OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 ./sblat3 < ./sblat3.dat rm -f ?BLAT2.SUMM OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 ./sblat2 < ./sblat2.dat I left it running for a full hour and it never made any progress past there. So I killed those two processes, at which point makepkg quit with /bin/sh: line 1: 31772 Killed OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 ./sblat3 < ./sblat3.dat Makefile:59: recipe for target 'level3' failed make[1]: *** [level3] Error 137 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /bin/sh: line 1: 31779 Killed OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 ./sblat2 < ./sblat2.dat Makefile:26: recipe for target 'level2' failed make[1]: *** [level2] Error 137 make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/yaourt-tmp-adam/aur-openblas-lapack/src/OpenBLAS-0.2.9/test' Makefile:111: recipe for target 'tests' failed make: *** [tests] Error 2 ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build openblas-lapack. Is there something I should be doing differently, or is this known already?

sftrytry commented on 2014-06-18 05:42 (UTC)

On my PC, I tested that 2.9 is much slower, 20%~25%, than 2.8.

sftrytry commented on 2013-11-23 02:05 (UTC)

@Xyne I have updated the PKGBUILD to let it provide itself. :) There is already a discussion in openblas package. gborzi, the maitainer, prefers to keep openblas as simple as possible.

Xyne commented on 2013-11-23 01:44 (UTC)

Hi, The package should also "provide" openblas if it provides all of the same functionality (and more). Have you discussed merging your optimizations into the openblas package? Regards, Xyne

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next › Last »