Package Details: opencl-nvidia-390xx 390.157-12

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-390xx-utils.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: nvidia-390xx-utils
Description: OpenCL implemention for NVIDIA
Upstream URL: https://www.nvidia.com/
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: opencl-nvidia
Provides: opencl-driver, opencl-nvidia
Submitter: svenstaro
Maintainer: jonathon (vnctdj)
Last Packager: vnctdj
Votes: 57
Popularity: 0.69
First Submitted: 2020-03-11 17:29 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-07-20 22:27 (UTC)

Dependencies (2)

Required by (68)

Sources (15)

Pinned Comments

jonathon commented on 2022-05-26 09:46 (UTC)

Please don't flag this package out-of-date unless a new version has been released by NVIDIA.

jonathon commented on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) by jonathon)

The DKMS package guidelines are explicit that linux-headers should not be a dependency of any DKMS package.

As a concrete example of why including that as a hard dependency is a bad idea, what happens when linux is not an installed kernel?

jonathon commented on 2020-10-19 12:41 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-11 14:18 (UTC) by jonathon)

PACKAGE NEEDS LONG TERM MAINTAINER

I have adopted the 390xx packages to keep them secure. I do not run any 390xx hardware so will not notice any breakages and cannot test any changes.

Until such time as someone else steps up to maintain these packages - ideally someone who actually has 390xx hardware - I have to rely on you to tell me what changes are needed.

Don't expect a response if you post only "this doesn't work", and do not email me to complain about the package not working!

Use this forum thread for discussion: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1946926

A binary package is also available in my kernel-lts unofficial user repository.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 25 Next › Last »

amb commented on 2023-05-04 02:51 (UTC)

Found the problem. On line 59 of PKGBUILD it must be: patch -Np1 -i ../../kernel-6.3.patch

instead of: patch -Np1 -i ../kernel-6.3.patch

amb commented on 2023-05-04 00:30 (UTC)

@vnctdj, the patch doesn't works here:

patch: **** Can't open patch file ../kernel-6.3.patch : No such file or directory

vnctdj commented on 2023-05-03 21:45 (UTC)

I've pushed a new version of the PKGBUILD.

Thanks for providing the new patch and for testing it. Unfortunately I don't have the time to test it myself for the moment...

canolucas commented on 2023-04-30 23:09 (UTC)

@vnctdj can you please add the following patch to the PKGBUILD: https://gitlab.com/herecura/packages/nvidia-390xx-dkms/-/blob/36af321ae3f3a1e177dd36c92ccd8f7ae3c8f1aa/kernel-6.3.patch

it is neccecsary for making this driver compatible with linux kernel v6.3 thank you so much for maintaining the driver so far !

hellopoisonx commented on 2023-04-26 13:10 (UTC)

@BlackIkeEagle,it works fine on linux6.3.0-x64v1-xanmod1-1

drankinatty commented on 2023-04-19 19:40 (UTC)

Since it looks like 6.3 will be out next week, anybody confirmed the 6.3 patch results in a working driver?

BlackIkeEagle commented on 2023-04-11 17:46 (UTC)

a patch for the upcoming 6.3 kernel: https://gitlab.com/herecura/packages/nvidia-390xx-dkms/-/blob/36af321ae3f3a1e177dd36c92ccd8f7ae3c8f1aa/kernel-6.3.patch

I have no idea if that makes the drivers work, it makes them build on 6.3rc6

NullRoute commented on 2023-03-15 21:40 (UTC)

Tested and everything works fine with linux kernel 6.2.6 and Nvidia 390.157-3 with Kernel 6.2 patch, but for some reason I get this older linux headers error.

Packages Installed:
  • Kernel: linux-6.2.6.arch1-1-x86_64
  • Headers: linux-headers-6.2.6.arch1-1-x86_64
  • API-Headers: linux-api-headers-6.1.9-1-any
  • Package: nvidia-390xx-dkms-390.157-3-x86_64
  • Video-Driver: nvidia-390xx-dkms-390.157-3-x86_64 (ERROR HERE)
  • Video-Utils: nvidia-390xx-utils-390.157-3-x86_64
  • Video-OpenCL: opencl-nvidia-390xx-390.157-3-x86_64
Error From Nvidia 390xx Driver

ERROR: Missing 6.1.8-arch1-1 kernel modules tree for module nvidia/390.157

drankinatty commented on 2023-02-28 05:46 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-28 05:48 (UTC) by drankinatty)

Since we are in need of a long-term maintainer, and since @vnctd did such a good job handling the patches for glibc-2.37 and the 6.2 kernel patch, I would nominate @vnctd as the new maintainer -- if he will do it.

I fumbled around getting the package to build without the patch to the point of drm failure, but then would have been stuck until I could find an existing patch for it. I know C and understood the errors

nv-acpi.c:77:19: error: initialization of XXX  from incompatible pointer type YYY
    77 |         .remove = nv_acpi_remove_two_args,

and

nvidia-drm-drv.c:244:21: error: ‘struct drm_mode_config’ has no member named ‘fb_base’
  244 |     dev->mode_config.fb_base = 0;

However, it would likely have taken me a bit more time to arrive at a full solution -- so I'm not the guy. Anyone else have a 2nd or other thoughts?

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 25 Next › Last »