Package Details: pacaur 4.8.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pacaur.git (read-only)
Package Base: pacaur
Description: An AUR helper that minimizes user interaction (fork)
Upstream URL: https://github.com/E5ten/pacaur
Licenses: ISC
Submitter: E5ten
Maintainer: E5ten
Last Packager: E5ten
Votes: 5
Popularity: 3.127670
First Submitted: 2019-02-14 16:38
Last Updated: 2019-02-21 22:42

Required by (10)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

Alad commented on 2019-02-21 02:37

Considering all the new "pacaur-in-cool-language" helpers have somehow managed to be more ill-designed and ill-implemented than pacaur and yaourt combined (an amazing feat, all things considered), I'm rooting for E5ten.

And while I haven't tried 4.8.x yet, to me it seems he's doing a good job so far.

imran27 commented on 2019-02-21 02:20

ZSH completions works now with updated pacaur 4.8.1-1

imran27 commented on 2019-02-21 01:07

ZSH completions for aur packages is not working like it used to. Any fix?

Spyhawk commented on 2019-02-15 15:17

Sorry, my previous comment wasn't meant to come as an attack on the new maintainer. These are worries about my own, unmaintainable code.

KnightMustard commented on 2019-02-15 00:37

Spyhawk has a point. I would not discount what he says because you think it's his ego. They are possible repercussions to consider.

ocelot commented on 2019-02-14 22:36

Get over yourself Spyhawk

shanewstone commented on 2019-02-14 21:35

Thanks for taking this on!

Spyhawk commented on 2019-02-14 21:17

I actually would have hoped you'd forked the project properly under another name. I'm somewhat familiar with the code and its ugliness, and I wouldn't expect anyone to be able to maintain the codebase 'reliably'. Not everyone is aware of the project being dropped, so I believe a new name might have better served users - they'd at least looked at all their available options.

Anonymous comment on 2019-02-14 19:11

I deeply hope you are seriously going to maintain and improve this for a longer period of time, as you submitted it under the original name while the old version was still working great.

airon90 commented on 2019-02-14 17:09

Is it correct that now pacaur is based on auracle? What will it change?