Also, python-arxiv is a dep -- papis complains without it that
Error while loading entrypoint 'EntryPoint(name='isbn', value='papis.isbn:Importer', group='papis.importer')': The 'arxiv>=1.0.0' distribution was not found and is required by papis.
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/papis-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | papis-git |
Description: | Command-line document and bibliography manager |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/papis/papis |
Licenses: | GPL-3.0-or-later |
Conflicts: | papis |
Provides: | papis |
Submitter: | sonam |
Maintainer: | sonam (gesh) |
Last Packager: | gesh |
Votes: | 4 |
Popularity: | 0.046391 |
First Submitted: | 2020-12-29 06:22 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-12-23 14:04 (UTC) |
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3
Also, python-arxiv is a dep -- papis complains without it that
Error while loading entrypoint 'EntryPoint(name='isbn', value='papis.isbn:Importer', group='papis.importer')': The 'arxiv>=1.0.0' distribution was not found and is required by papis.
Might want to add an optdep on https://pypi.org/project/papis-scihub/, am packaging it now. (E: packaged, at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-papis-scihub-git) Also might want to break up the optdeps line.
thanks @fbearoff! i've actually moved on to nixos in the meantime. would you be interested in taking over maintenance of this package?
requires python-dominate
Pinned Comments
gesh commented on 2024-03-13 11:15 (UTC)
Note! Papis skips integration tests for certain optdeps if they aren't installed[1]. Since checkdeps should contain all the dependencies to check a standard build, I've added these to
checkdepends
.If you're not planning on installing these optdeps and want to skip these specific tests, feel free to comment out the relevant lines in the
checkdepends
array. (This incidentally also goes for the multiple dependencies for themypy
tests, if they bother people).The relevant dependencies at this time are:
python-jinja
,python-markdownify
,python-whoosh
[1] - https://github.com/papis/papis/issues/776#issuecomment-1991874151