Search Criteria
Package Details: picoscope7beta 7.1.48_1r5000-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/picoscope7beta.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | picoscope7beta |
Description: | PicoScope 7 Test and Measurment Early Access |
Upstream URL: | https://oem.picotech.com/p7beta/download |
Keywords: | picoscope picoscope7 picoscope7beta |
Licenses: | custom |
Conflicts: | picoscope7 |
Provides: | picoscope7 |
Submitter: | Schorsch |
Maintainer: | Schorsch |
Last Packager: | Schorsch |
Votes: | 4 |
Popularity: | 0.000012 |
First Submitted: | 2022-02-05 23:21 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-02-21 02:03 (UTC) |
Dependencies (16)
- desktop-file-utils (desktop-file-utils-gitAUR)
- fuse2
- ps7b_libpicocvAUR
- ps7b_libpicoippAUR
- ttf-roboto (ttf-roboto-fontconfigAUR, ttf-roboto-variableAUR, ttf-google-fonts-typewolfAUR)
- which (busybox-coreutilsAUR, which-gitAUR)
- ps7b_libps2000AUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 2000 series
- ps7b_libps2000aAUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 2000a series
- ps7b_libps3000AUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 3000 series
- ps7b_libps3000aAUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 3000a series
- ps7b_libps4000AUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 4000 series
- ps7b_libps4000aAUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 4000a series
- ps7b_libps5000AUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 5000 series
- ps7b_libps5000aAUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 5000a series
- ps7b_libps6000AUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 6000 series
- ps7b_libps6000aAUR (optional) – Support for PicoScope 6000a series
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »
Schorsch commented on 2025-02-20 19:07 (UTC)
I should try that one of these days, I've usually just been testing on Manjaro, so maybe Arch is missing some dependencies out of the box that I take for granted... Thanks.
SadiQ commented on 2025-02-20 19:05 (UTC)
It's just plain vanilla arch, latest kernel, everything installed using the Installation Guide from the wiki (as I said..I can follow a tutorial and adapt some commands to give me less errors :) )
Schorsch commented on 2025-02-20 18:59 (UTC) (edited on 2025-02-20 19:00 (UTC) by Schorsch)
Yeah, I don't really know which driver goes for which scope, I have 3203D and I need the 3000a driver :) Glad you got it at least kinda running!
Also I meant to ask: What distro are you running on?
SadiQ commented on 2025-02-20 18:46 (UTC) (edited on 2025-02-20 18:48 (UTC) by SadiQ)
Fixed!!! Yes I did reinstall the package. I edited the file and I got a permission error:
It seems it belongs to root and it has no execute permissions.
I
chmod +x
that file and the app started, but it failed to detect my pico. I also needed to install some optional package. I have a pico 2205a so of course I installed theps7b_libps2000a
package but that didn't work as I obviously needed theps7b_libps2000
package (or both) to get my scope working :)All was great for about 5 minutes because the app crashed...but at least I could get it running :)
@Schorsch Thanks for your work and the help. Keep improving mate!
Schorsch commented on 2025-02-20 17:30 (UTC) (edited on 2025-02-20 17:32 (UTC) by Schorsch)
@SadiQ I assume you reinstalled the package after adding root to the suders file, so the postinst ran without error?
Try editing the picoscope binary (it's actually just a script that calls the main executable) with this command: sudo nano $(which picoscope)
Remove everything behind the $@ on the last line, save and then run picoscope from the terminal. This way you get its full output and maybe some more info about what's going wrong.
Alternatively just running
/opt/picoscope/lib/PicoScope.GTK
instead ofpicoscope
should also work I guess.SadiQ commented on 2025-02-20 17:20 (UTC) (edited on 2025-02-20 17:22 (UTC) by SadiQ)
@Schorsch I'm not new to linux, but I'm not a power user. I've been a noob linux user on and off for the last 20 years. I can follow tutorials and change a command here and there to show me less errors :) I actually think that this is my first ever comment on archlinux.
Now...back to the issue. I added root to /etc/sudoers for the simple fact that I saw it available in a /etc/sudoers.pacnew file on my system(I was probably supposed to do something with that file at some point...but I didn't get to it), and now picoscope got installed, but it doesn't run:
Anything I can try?
Schorsch commented on 2025-02-20 16:44 (UTC)
@SadiQ New to this as in "new to Linux"? :)
All I can tell from your error is that apparently your install/distro seems to have issues if root runs a sudo command.
The postinst is a script in the package that runs after the install and sets up some device permissions. Apparently this contains a few commands with "sudo", which makes sense because root can set up permissions.
As you may know "sudo" is commonly used to run a single command as root even if you are not root. The sudoers file in /etc/sudoers controls who can do that and can even set some limits and options for it.
So obviously it's redundant to run a command with "sudo" if you're already root. Now usually I would expect that not to throw an error, because even though it's redundant, it can't really do more damage than you can already do if you're root.
So on one hand it makes no sense to have root in the sudoers file, but then again I can't think of a reason it would hurt.
All I can say is that if you're going to edit the sudoers file and you're new to all this, use the command visudo and don't directly open the file in a text editor, or you might learn what it means to lose all administrative access to your computer ;)
SadiQ commented on 2025-02-17 16:20 (UTC) (edited on 2025-02-17 16:21 (UTC) by SadiQ)
Hello. I just tried to install this and I get the following error :
Any tips on what I can try? (I'm pretty new to this)
vaar commented on 2025-02-16 18:10 (UTC)
Thanks! It works great now.
Schorsch commented on 2025-02-16 14:46 (UTC)
Hey @vaar Thanks for commenting, I'm not using this package all that much these days but want to keep it up to date and functional.
gtk-sharp is no longer required for the beta version of Picoscope 7, and the "stable" version I currently consider broken until this requirement is removed there too upstream.
I don't think the error you're seeing has to do with gtk-sharp, but with the picocv and picoipp libraries themselves. I just updated those two packages to run execstack on the libraries during install to clear their executable stack flag. Not entirely sure if that is a good fix but it seems to do the trick for now. Let me know!
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »