Search Criteria
Package Details: pipelight 0.7.20-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/pipelight.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | pipelight |
Description: | A Rust based quick automation tool |
Upstream URL: | https://packages.pipelight.dev/pipelight-0.7.20-1-any.pkg.tar.zst |
Keywords: | ansible automation bash cicd continuous deployment git hook integration jenkins pipelight pipeline rust sh typescript wrapper |
Licenses: | GPL2 |
Conflicts: | pipelight-git |
Provides: | pipelight |
Submitter: | areskul |
Maintainer: | areskul |
Last Packager: | areskul |
Votes: | 0 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2022-12-19 11:20 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-01-22 15:32 (UTC) |
Dependencies (5)
- deno (deno-gitAUR, deno-initAUR)
- watchexec (watchexec-gitAUR)
- cargo (rustup-gitAUR, rust-nightly-binAUR, rust-gitAUR, rust-beta-binAUR, rustup-stubAUR, rust, rustup) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- make (make-gitAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2
jghodd commented on 2022-12-21 16:47 (UTC) (edited on 2022-12-21 16:52 (UTC) by jghodd)
@areskul - i went ahead and changed the old package name to pipelight-plugin, partly because it has several components with pipelight-plugin in the file name. also changed its Makefile to relocate some of its components to directories named pipelight-plugin vs just pipelight (/usr/lib/pipelight-plugin, /usr/share/pipelight-plugin) so as not to conflict with anything you do going forward (like adding a library, for instance). the changes are confined to my distro, and my users will be informed of the change. i'm pretty sure not many are using it, if any at all, but in the off-chance some of my users are still using it, they'll have the pipelight-plugin package to replace it. since it's the same source base, it's just a straight replacement package using the same versioning. unfortunately, i couldn't use the 'replaces' tag in the PKGBUILD, because that would have blocked the co-installation of both the old and new pipelight packages.
jghodd commented on 2022-12-21 02:03 (UTC)
@areskul - i'm fine with it being a new package of new software. the last time i built the old version was january, 2017. there is nothing that depends on it, so i'm good with what you've done. was just curious about what happened. thanks for the explanation.
areskul commented on 2022-12-20 10:02 (UTC) (edited on 2022-12-20 10:05 (UTC) by areskul)
@jghodd - The pipelight package has been deleted some time ago. I took the name to upload a whole different software. It's my first time submitting to the aur. Should i use another name or do you mind if i reupload the deleted package under another name like "pipelight-browser-plugin" ? Sorry if it broke dependencies, I will do my best to repare.
jghodd commented on 2022-12-19 18:36 (UTC) (edited on 2022-12-19 18:41 (UTC) by jghodd)
@areskul - just curious here. i currently have pipelight-0.2.8.2 installed. why the downgrade to 0.1.2? or is this a whole new piece of software with a different purpose...
« First ‹ Previous 1 2