Search Criteria
Package Details: pkgcacheclean 1.9.0-3
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgcacheclean.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | pkgcacheclean |
Description: | Application to clean the pacman package cache |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/dbermond/pkgcacheclean/ |
Licenses: | GPL |
Submitter: | Auguste |
Maintainer: | dbermond |
Last Packager: | dbermond |
Votes: | 105 |
Popularity: | 1.26 |
First Submitted: | 2010-10-18 08:11 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2019-05-26 13:36 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
dbermond commented on 2019-11-03 13:58 (UTC)
@karhu A rebuild against the installed pacman version is sufficient, so it links against the current libalpm.so.12. Don't know why a rebuild is not working for you, because it should work.
karhu commented on 2019-10-26 16:44 (UTC) (edited on 2019-10-26 16:45 (UTC) by karhu)
Hello
I got this error message :
error while loading shared libraries: libalpm.so.11
I think it's because pacman was updated to version 5.2. For the same message with package-query I solved it with a rebuild, but with pkgcacheclean it didn't work.
What can I do ? Thanks for your help.
(may be the second one message).
shulamy commented on 2019-06-08 13:10 (UTC)
OK thanks
rufovillosum commented on 2019-06-04 11:27 (UTC)
Getting the following from gpg:
sudo gpg --recv-keys 019A7474297D8577 gpg: key 019A7474297D8577: 4 signatures not checked due to missing keys gpg: key 019A7474297D8577: "Daniel Bermond danielbermond@gmail.com" not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1
dbermond commented on 2019-06-02 15:34 (UTC) (edited on 2019-06-02 15:34 (UTC) by dbermond)
@shulamy Before building the package, you need to import the pgp key by doing:
$ gpg --recv-keys 019A7474297D8577
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Makepkg#ERROR:_One_or_more_PGP_signatures_could_not_be_verified!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/GnuPG#Use_a_keyserver
shulamy commented on 2019-06-02 14:32 (UTC)
pkgcacheclean-1.9.0.tar.gz ... FAILED (unknown public key 019A7474297D8577) ==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!
dbermond commented on 2017-09-07 12:24 (UTC)
grimsock commented on 2017-09-07 12:16 (UTC)
dbermond commented on 2017-09-07 11:53 (UTC)
grimsock commented on 2017-09-07 11:43 (UTC)
kd35a commented on 2017-08-24 13:16 (UTC)
grimsock commented on 2017-05-21 07:55 (UTC)
Anty commented on 2017-04-14 00:28 (UTC)
kd35a commented on 2016-05-22 10:47 (UTC)
Bazon commented on 2016-02-01 11:46 (UTC)
phillid commented on 2015-01-12 03:32 (UTC)
phillid commented on 2015-01-12 03:19 (UTC)
WhiteKnight commented on 2014-11-27 22:31 (UTC)
Gently commented on 2014-10-16 16:30 (UTC)
Auguste commented on 2014-10-15 12:45 (UTC)
Gently commented on 2014-10-15 11:16 (UTC)
stevenhoneyman commented on 2014-05-31 15:13 (UTC)
Auguste commented on 2013-04-20 05:36 (UTC)
tarakbumba commented on 2013-04-19 22:07 (UTC)
SanskritFritz commented on 2012-01-18 05:41 (UTC)
Auguste commented on 2012-01-18 00:53 (UTC)
SanskritFritz commented on 2012-01-17 22:08 (UTC)