Package Details: pycharm-professional 2024.1.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pycharm-professional
Description: Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition
Upstream URL: https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/
Keywords: development editor ide jetbrains python
Licenses: custom
Submitter: hippojazz
Maintainer: Xavier (37h4n)
Last Packager: Xavier
Votes: 288
Popularity: 2.01
First Submitted: 2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-30 17:33 (UTC)

Dependencies (19)

Required by (0)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .. 44 Next › Last »

Xavier commented on 2023-12-13 21:59 (UTC)

Hi @ginkel, you could use the chaotic-aur repository, they build this package.

ginkel commented on 2023-12-13 14:25 (UTC)

Hi there,

Jetbrains download servers are agonizingly slow from Deutsche Telekom's network in Germany. Jetbrains recommends to use the CloudFlare CDN in this case: https://intellij-support.jetbrains.com/hc/en-us/articles/206544699

Would that be an option for this AUR?

Thanks, Thilo

Xavier commented on 2023-12-12 00:58 (UTC)

Hi @nerdoc, that issue is confirmed in https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-313202 I applied the temporal workaround, thanks for reporting it.

nerdoc commented on 2023-12-10 12:39 (UTC)

Again, with 2023.3 the same error is preventing pycharm from starting correctly:

[1210/133621.781923:FATAL:setuid_sandbox_host.cc(158)] The SUID sandbox helper binary was found, but is not configured correctly. Rather than run without sandboxing I'm aborting now. You need to make sure that /opt/pycharm-professional/jbr/lib/chrome-sandbox is owned by root and has mode 4755.

A

sudo chmod 4755 /opt/pycharm-professional/jbr/lib/chrome-sandbox

Repairs it.

kingcreole commented on 2023-12-08 10:24 (UTC) (edited on 2023-12-08 10:31 (UTC) by kingcreole)

Just as I wanted to file a complaint that pycharm isn't allowing debugging due to a missing file in the pydev folder it started working again, but I have allready logged in so I want to at least wish you a woderfull day and say thank you for the update :D (uninstall and reinstall seem to have done the trick, normal reinstall on manjaro using pamac seem to not have done the trick 3 times before)

Xavier commented on 2023-12-03 21:51 (UTC)

@BlurryFlurry that is a weird error, it seems that you are running pycharm in a specific java environment, Remember that this package has its own JRE inside, so you don't need JRE at all. Try to run it in a clean shell/environment.

BlurryFlurry commented on 2023-12-03 07:19 (UTC) (edited on 2023-12-03 07:21 (UTC) by BlurryFlurry)

I get this error when launching pycharm

CompileCommand: exclude com/intellij/openapi/vfs/impl/FilePartNodeRoot.trieDescend bool exclude = true
Error: Could not find or load main class —add-opens=java.base.jdk.internal.org.objectweb.asm=ALL-UNNAMED
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: —add-opens=java.base.jdk.internal.org.objectweb.asm=ALL-UNNAMED

Ashark commented on 2023-11-05 19:53 (UTC)

Ok.
You probably wanted to keep executable name short? For example, intellij idea packages uses such naming idea-ce-eap and idea-ue-eap for community edition and for ultimate edition.
If you want to keep it short, we may use something like pycharm-pe or pycharm-pro. But this also would make us think of package renaming. I wanted to keep package naming in AUR consistent. Currently, the other pycharm packages use the extensive names like "professional" and "community" (except pycharm-edu, which is going to be deleted). Naming can be rethought of course.

Xavier commented on 2023-11-05 19:44 (UTC)

ok, let me think about that change, my only concern is changing the name of the executable...

Ashark commented on 2023-11-05 19:33 (UTC)

1) increase pgrel and force the package to be rebuilt for all users because removing an opt depends? worth it?

I do not see a problem in such PKGBUILD updates. The building package is not such a long thing. And if users want, they may see the change and decide not to update for a while. But ok, let this be up to you.

What I don't like is changing the name of the executable, in the official documents for the command line for example it is pycharm and not pycharm-professional, and maybe users are used to running with the official name, and change that maybe affect the user experience.

I think it worth changing name of executable followed by package name. For example, every eap package (for every product) changes the name of executable to <procuct_name>-eap.

I saw some packages do not install the binary symlink at all because of this reason, for example, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve. But I still would prefer to have such symlink in the package, rather than creating it myself.

Another thing is if you have a pycharm license for the professional version, why do you want the community version?

For tests/checks for example. The pycharm community package had a problem of not showing the --help output. I wanted to check if the maintainer of aur package did something wrong, or jetbrains. And I wanted to check if it works in professional edition. But that made me uninstall community edition, which is unwanted.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .. 44 Next › Last »