I also miss it. I think the nojdk version should be the default one.
You don't need the update-cache part in the .install file anymore, it's done by pacman now. You find files with the name in /usr/share/libalpm/hooks/.
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | pycharm-professional |
Description: | Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition |
Upstream URL: | https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/ |
Keywords: | development editor ide jetbrains python |
Licenses: | custom |
Submitter: | hippojazz |
Maintainer: | Xavier (37h4n) |
Last Packager: | Xavier |
Votes: | 286 |
Popularity: | 0.89 |
First Submitted: | 2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-05-01 20:08 (UTC) |
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 .. 43 Next › Last »
I also miss it. I think the nojdk version should be the default one.
You don't need the update-cache part in the .install file anymore, it's done by pacman now. You find files with the name in /usr/share/libalpm/hooks/.
What happened to the no-jdk version?
@zerophase Can't reproduce. It sounds more like an GTK misconfiguration on your side.
Getting a warning for not finding gtk-engine-murrine, when launching PyCharm from the console. I think it's an optional dependency.
Please quote the paths, such as $pkgdir
==> WARNING: Package contains reference to $srcdir
opt/pycharm-professional/helpers/pydev/_pydevd_bundle_ext/pydevd_cython.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
opt/pycharm-professional/helpers/pydev/_pydevd_frame_eval_ext/pydevd_frame_evaluator.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
Hi @resurtm, you can set the java options in the file ~/.bash_profile (not in ~/.bashrc):
export _JAVA_OPTIONS='...'
e.g:
export _JAVA_OPTIONS='-Dawt.useSystemAAFontSettings=lcd'
Hey there! Nice package. :-)
I have a question: how can I adjust JVM settings for this PyCharm distribution? I remember in distribution coming from JetBrains there were some files called something like vmoptions and vmoptions64.
Is there anything like that in this package?
Thank you!
@marquicus, it seems that packaging for python 3 is missing, check from repositories: sudo pacman -Sy python-packaging
It throws the following error:
==> Validating source files with sha256sums... pycharm-professional-2018.1.tar.gz ... Passed pycharm-professional.desktop ... Passed pycharm-professional.install ... Passed pycharm ... Passed charm.desktop ... Passed charm ... Passed ==> Extracting sources... -> Extracting pycharm-professional-2018.1.tar.gz with bsdtar ==> Starting build()... Traceback (most recent call last): File "helpers/pydev/setup_cython.py", line 14, in <module> from setuptools import setup File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/setuptools/init.py", line 14, in <module> from setuptools.dist import Distribution, Feature File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 21, in <module> from setuptools.extern import packaging File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/setuptools/extern/init.py", line 61, in load_module "distribution.".format(**locals()) ImportError: The 'packaging' package is required; normally this is bundled with this package so if you get this warning, consult the packager of your distribution. ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build pycharm-professional. ==> Restart building pycharm-professional ? [y/N] ==> ---------------------------------------------</module></module></module>
==> ERROR: unable to update
The missing package is installed
$ pip install packaging Requirement already satisfied: packaging in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages Requirement already satisfied: six in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages (from packaging) Requirement already satisfied: pyparsing>=2.0.2 in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages (from packaging)
Pinned Comments