Package Details: pycharm-professional 2024.1.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pycharm-professional
Description: Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition
Upstream URL: https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/
Keywords: development editor ide jetbrains python
Licenses: custom
Submitter: hippojazz
Maintainer: Xavier (37h4n)
Last Packager: Xavier
Votes: 286
Popularity: 0.93
First Submitted: 2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-01 20:08 (UTC)

Dependencies (19)

Required by (0)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 .. 43 Next › Last »

Xavier commented on 2016-04-03 14:26 (UTC)

ohh yeah Python 8! :)

lybin commented on 2016-04-03 08:07 (UTC)

http://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2016/04/pycharm-2016-1-1-eap-is-available/ You don't believe, but they dropped support for older Python versions before Python 3.5 and added preliminary support for Python 8 *ROFL*

Xavier commented on 2016-04-02 19:25 (UTC)

Hi @zopieux, I don't believe that the latest version Pycharm drop support the java 7, where did you read that?, I think that if Pycharm works in different versions of Java, is better the user choose the Java version to use. (and the next version 2016.1.1 is not released yet)

zopieux commented on 2016-04-02 14:58 (UTC)

Latest version requires Java 8. You should fix the dependencies, as Java 7 is not an option anymore. You should also fix the .desktop so it uses the right Java (8!) path.

Xavier commented on 2016-03-31 15:45 (UTC)

Thanks @vdemin for your help, I just tested temporally hard delete the giflib (-Rdd) and can run Pycharm without errors. Maybe this bug report only success with intellij-idea or the new versions don't have this problem

vdemin commented on 2016-03-31 08:15 (UTC)

Thanks for your work! Found this old bug: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/26511 Can someone run PyCharm on OpenJDK without giflib? It runs successfully on JDK.

Xavier commented on 2016-03-30 21:32 (UTC) (edited on 2016-03-30 21:33 (UTC) by Xavier)

Me too I used this for years but we have not problems because we have installed these packages before, the namcap said that some binaries of Pycharm needs of alsa-lib and gtk2, I agree with you for confirm this this need test in a clean environment without DE, but now I have not time for that, then for now I will delete alsa-lib and gtk2 as hard dependencies, is better. Thank you! with respect with giflib, I saw some pycharm build in others distributions (ubuntu ppa and gentoo) and they not put giflib as depends

vdemin commented on 2016-03-30 21:08 (UTC)

Never used namcap, but alsa-lib and gtk2 definitely should not be hard dependencies. The package should be compiled on any machines without any DE, therefore ttf-font should be in depends. giflib may not be needed, but it is best to check it in a clean environment. Previous set of depends has been tested for years, and I would suggest not to touch it without good reason.

Xavier commented on 2016-03-30 20:25 (UTC)

Hi @vdemin, I used namcap (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/namcap) for check dependencies, this recommended delete ttf-font, giflib and added the others packages, I know namcap is not perfect. The ttf-font is autoinclude when you install a (most) DE, now I'm thinking added it (maybe is better), namcap detect that giflib is not used by any binary/library in Pycharm (but I don't sure if really pycharm use giflib)

vdemin commented on 2016-03-30 20:02 (UTC)

Thank you! Just curious about other depends, why did you include alsa-lib, gtk2, libxslt and remove ttf-font, giflib? Depends of the community package looks more correct: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/intellij-idea-community-edition/ depends=('java-environment' 'giflib' 'libxtst' 'libxft' 'ttf-font')

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 .. 43 Next › Last »