AUR (en) - pycharm-professional

Search Criteria

Package Details: pycharm-professional 2024.2.3-1

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	pycharm-professional
Description:	Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition
Upstream URL:	https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/
Keywords:	development editor ide jetbrains python
Licenses:	custom
Submitter:	hippojazz
Maintainer:	Xavier (37h4n)
Last Packager:	Xavier
Votes:	288
Popularity:	1.30
First Submitted:	2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2024-09-27 23:19 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

pycharm-professional

Description:

Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition

Upstream URL:

https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/

Keywords:

development editor ide jetbrains python

Licenses:

custom

Submitter:

hippojazz

Maintainer:

Xavier (37h4n)

Last Packager:

Xavier

Votes:

288

Popularity:

1.30

First Submitted:

2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2024-09-27 23:19 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 .. 44 Next › Last »

Xavier commented on 2017-08-18 04:07 (UTC)

Hi @SLKun, I checked the pkgbuild and this not have problems, the other sha256sums is only for nojdk package. Check your installation again.

SLKun commented on 2017-08-18 03:27 (UTC)

There are two problems when I install. 1. The sha256 checksum that I downloaded many times is '3f967aacb231a709afff9ac3191127d8f9c5ec4beb9ecb5d7c4f120e6691d879' rather than '365806065b9b2e0f530a2573864fe44efa8af5bd022562742d16f4a0f8938a68' which is provided by Jetbrains. It seems that @azrdev meet the same problem. I think maybe it can be check. 2. The folder of v2017.2.1 after decompression is 'pycharm-2017.2' rather than 'pycharm-_pkgver(2017.2.1)'. Maybe JetBrain have changed their naming rules?

nmiculinic commented on 2017-08-12 10:38 (UTC)

Hmm, I guess it's leftover from pycharm community. After deleting the file it appears working

Xavier commented on 2017-08-12 03:08 (UTC) (edited on 2017-08-12 03:15 (UTC) by Xavier)

Hi @nmiculinic, It so odd, the package does not install anything on /usr/local please check your installation, maybe you have another installation of Pycharm

nmiculinic commented on 2017-08-11 23:15 (UTC) (edited on 2017-08-11 23:15 (UTC) by nmiculinic)

[code] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/pycharm", line 108, in <module> start_new_instance(ide_args) File "/usr/local/bin/pycharm", line 103, in start_new_instance os.execv(RUN_PATH, [bin_file] + args) FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory [/code] When trying to start pycharm

Xavier commented on 2017-07-31 17:21 (UTC)

Hi @azrdev, good idea, read the pinned comment for use it.

azrdev commented on 2017-07-29 18:03 (UTC) (edited on 2017-07-29 18:05 (UTC) by azrdev)

@XavierCLL I appreciate very much that you provide & maintain the no-jdk option in the PKGBUILD, I'm happily using it. Would it be possible to define this once as a flag/variable, instead of having to modify 3 locations? Edit: also it seems the pycharm-professional-2017.2-no-jdk.tar.gz doesn't match the checksum you provided, have they changed it?

Xavier commented on 2017-07-28 22:29 (UTC)

Yes @allspark you are right, the built package is not arch independent, fixed, thanks

allspark commented on 2017-07-28 19:16 (UTC)

"If a package is architecture-independent in its compiled state (shell scripts, fonts, themes, many types of extensions, etc.) then use arch=('any'). Please note that, as this is intended for packages that can be built once and used on any architecture, it will cause the package to be labeled -any as opposed to -i686, -x86_64, etc." [1] [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 .. 44 Next › Last »

Arch Linux User Repository