AUR (en) - pycharm-professional

Search Criteria

Package Details: pycharm-professional 2025.1-1

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	pycharm-professional
Description:	Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition
Upstream URL:	https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/
Keywords:	development editor ide jetbrains python
Licenses:	custom
Submitter:	hippojazz
Maintainer:	Xavier (37h4n)
Last Packager:	Xavier
Votes:	292
Popularity:	0.31
First Submitted:	2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2025-04-17 13:27 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

pycharm-professional

Description:

Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition

Upstream URL:

https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/

Keywords:

development editor ide jetbrains python

Licenses:

custom

Submitter:

hippojazz

Maintainer:

Xavier (37h4n)

Last Packager:

Xavier

Votes:

292

Popularity:

0.31

First Submitted:

2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2025-04-17 13:27 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 .. 46 Next › Last »

ajong commented on 2020-08-15 03:30 (UTC)

Just updated to 2020.2 on my XFCE Manjaro system. For some reason, natural scrolling is being inconsistent within PyCharm. The markdown visualization behaves properly with natural scrolling, but the code editor scrolls in the opposite direction. Certainly a strange bug! I'm using libinput for smooth scrolling, could be the issue? I realize this is most likely an issue with my personal device, but would anyone know how to fix this, please?

Xavier commented on 2020-07-30 17:28 (UTC) (edited on 2020-07-30 17:33 (UTC) by Xavier)

Hi @navarroaxel, good point, I set the ".0" to specify that it is the first version of the main release "2020.2", "literally" I'm not changing the package version but at the same time you're right, I'll do it for the next main release.

navarroaxel commented on 2020-07-30 11:24 (UTC)

The https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_package_guidelines#Package_versioning says that the package version "should be the same as the version released by the author". I think you should use 2020.2 without the trailing ".0".

grinderz commented on 2020-07-14 05:38 (UTC)

i'm waiting fixed updates via pkgrelease version in terminal, seems sometimes need open browser ))

Xavier commented on 2020-07-13 19:41 (UTC)

@lybin yes I know, but sometimes for some small changes or fixes it is not necessary, it can wait for the next release

lybin commented on 2020-07-13 19:25 (UTC)

Please increase pkgrel= when you make internal package changes, thanks

Xavier commented on 2020-07-13 19:21 (UTC)

Updated, thank @jheinz and sorry for that I wanted to push this small fix for the next update but I forgot to update the current shasums

jheinz commented on 2020-07-13 08:47 (UTC) (edited on 2020-07-13 08:49 (UTC) by jheinz)

Hi @XavierCLL, I think since you removed that line from charm.desktop yesterday, you'll also need to change its SHA256 sum from '773f169fac40fa5df69ccf90680238524f99c42aaa2b037e78e01cfc8c545280' to 'b026ef96831448be743f86e7e44bfa676629e8c3eb418c893fd87515c06263a7' in order to fix the validity check. Thanks for your work and quick responses!

meirg commented on 2020-07-12 20:47 (UTC)

@XavierCLL Yes, that works too

Xavier commented on 2020-07-12 18:46 (UTC) (edited on 2020-07-12 18:47 (UTC) by Xavier)

thanks @lybin JetBrains does not provide this desktop entry (neither the charm by default), I created it for this Archlinux package and I realized that the StartupWMClass is not necessary for the charm.desktop entry, thanks @meirg for the report it and confirm if your problem is fixed if you delete the line StartupWMClass in the /usr/share/applications/charm.desktop and running sudo update-desktop-database -q