Package Details: pycharm-professional 2024.3.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pycharm-professional
Description: Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition
Upstream URL: https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/
Keywords: development editor ide jetbrains python
Licenses: custom
Submitter: hippojazz
Maintainer: Xavier (37h4n)
Last Packager: Xavier
Votes: 293
Popularity: 1.73
First Submitted: 2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-28 12:53 (UTC)

Dependencies (19)

Required by (0)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

Xavier commented on 2024-12-20 15:15 (UTC)

MANUAL INTERVENTION FOR v2024.3.1.1:

Due to the latest changes for the cython speed up, this release is going to show a commit transaction conflicting files, to fix this you need to enable Cython Speed ​​Up file overwriting:

[aur helper] pycharm-professional --overwrite '/opt/pycharm-professional/plugins/python-ce/helpers/pydev/*'

or after manual build:

sudo pacman -U pycharm-professional-2024.3.1.1-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst --overwrite '/opt/pycharm-professional/plugins/python-ce/helpers/pydev/*'

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 .. 45 Next › Last »

Xavier commented on 2016-07-18 04:42 (UTC)

Hi jwilliamn, sorry I forget update the list of check-sums in the last commit, just at the moment I'm not with my laptop, for fix temporally please change line 4 of sha256sums with this (inside pkgbuild): 43e79e5a786fc76385634dc0a9f1c3489b25031745b840b0822b059fc91d1060

jwilliamn commented on 2016-07-18 03:40 (UTC)

Hi, I got this error: ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build pycharm-professional. @XavierCLL any help?

Xavier commented on 2016-07-16 16:35 (UTC)

Hi @nexero, for me work with both, but I think the bash shell is better for this, I changed it without increase version, thanks for the report.

nexero commented on 2016-07-16 08:16 (UTC)

pycharm doesn't start if I execute /usr/bin/pycharm If I replace '#!/bin/sh -l' with '#!/bin/bash -l' everything works as expected though... The man page of /bin @XavierCLL: Can you take a look at this?

Xavier commented on 2016-06-10 04:26 (UTC)

I have jre8-openjdk too, but when i run the "archlinux-java get" it return "java-8-openjdk/jre", run "archlinux-java status" and try install it with other aur manager like yaourt/pacaur or using makepkg directly.

FirefighterBlu3 commented on 2016-06-10 04:17 (UTC)

jre8-openjdk

Xavier commented on 2016-06-08 21:14 (UTC)

@FirefighterBlue3, which package do you have installed that provide the java=8-jre? @bbolgradov, if you want the Java 8 environment with JetBrains modifications you cant install this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jre8-openjdk-jetbrains-git/

FirefighterBlu3 commented on 2016-06-08 19:26 (UTC)

[non-root@Scott ~]$ pb -S pycharm-professional ==> Building pycharm-professional... -> aur/pycharm-professional 2016.1.4-1 (107 votes) [installed: 2016.1-3] -> Powerful Python and Django IDE. Professional edition ==> Cloning the git repository... Already up-to-date. ==> Checking dependencies... ==> ERROR: Failed to fulfill package dependency requirement: java-runtime>=8 (Package: pycharm-professional-2016.1.4-1) [non-root@Scott ~]$ archlinux-java get java-8-jre/jre any suggestions on what needs fixed?

Xavier commented on 2016-06-02 02:16 (UTC)

Hi @bbolgradov, We talk about this topic before, with the last version of JDK (v8) there aren't problems of HiDPI or font rendering, do you know what exactly fixes are applied in the bundled inside pycharm? or do you have any problems with this pycharm using the Java of Archlinux?, the official Java of the Archlinux is adjusted/fixes for the distribution (and more update), is better use that. But we can put this topic in discussion. Hi @JohnRobson, I don't know, this seems to be a DE problems (do you use gnome?)

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 .. 45 Next › Last »