Package Details: pycharm-professional 2024.3-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pycharm-professional
Description: Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition
Upstream URL: https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/
Keywords: development editor ide jetbrains python
Licenses: custom
Submitter: hippojazz
Maintainer: Xavier (37h4n)
Last Packager: Xavier
Votes: 289
Popularity: 0.97
First Submitted: 2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-14 03:02 (UTC)

Dependencies (19)

Required by (0)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Next › Last »

SoonerBourne commented on 2013-12-06 00:48 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw that too but didn't want to mark it as "2" since I didn't think that was the appropriate action. I submitted the PKGBUILD file to the forum to see what other feedback I could get. So far I got a few items I'm getting corrected for the next release of PyCharm. I haven't been able to find a roadmap or release schedule from JetBrains, so who knows when the changes will show up here.

Psykar commented on 2013-12-05 22:46 (UTC)

Oh - unfortunately because your previous PKGBUILD had a pkgrel of 131.618, and you've just changed it to '1' it's not recognised as an update by pacman (and by extension, yaourt / packer etc) Might have to save bumping the pkgrel back down to 1 until the next upstream release.

Psykar commented on 2013-12-05 22:42 (UTC)

Yeah no worries (I clicked out of date in a clicking frenzy and (of course) it's not possible to 'unclick' it) I just happened to notice it when doing a namcap after the build. Thanks for the quick fix :)

SoonerBourne commented on 2013-12-05 14:33 (UTC)

@Psykar I don't think flagging a package out of date was the appropriate action given that the software WAS actually up to date. However, I do appreciate the feedback and took over this package under the assumption that the original submitter had everything correct, which was possibly a bad assumption on my part. I have implemented the changes you requested. Testing locally both an upgrade and a clean install worked, so I pushed the change to here. If you have any further suggestions please let me know in the comments or via email. Thanks!

Psykar commented on 2013-12-05 04:49 (UTC)

This package creates an aboslute symbolic link which ends up pointing to the build directory: ie: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 111 Dec 5 15:39 /usr/bin/pycharm.sh -> /tmp/yaourt-tmp-louis/aur-pycharm-professional/pkg/pycharm-professional/opt/pycharm-professional/bin/pycharm.sh This line in the PKGBUILD needs fixing: ln -s $pkgdir/opt/$pkgname/bin/pycharm.sh $pkgdir/usr/bin to cd $pkgdir ln -s opt/$pkgname/bin/pycharm.sh usr/bin

SoonerBourne commented on 2013-12-04 23:00 (UTC)

@epsilom Noted, rather than force everyone to update again I will correct when JetBrains updates.

Xavier commented on 2013-12-04 22:17 (UTC)

Hi @SoonerBourne the variable "pkgrel" is for PKGBUILD revision no for software revision, please consider read https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pkgbuild#pkgrel regards

hippojazz commented on 2013-12-04 17:41 (UTC)

disowning this package because I'm travelling for rest of the year and won't be able to keep it up to date

dobo commented on 2013-11-13 18:46 (UTC)

The symlink is broken. It symlinks to actual directory where the package is built :D. It should be: ln -s /opt/$pkgname/bin/pycharm.sh $pkgdir/usr/bin instead of: ln -s $pkgdir/opt/$pkgname/bin/pycharm.sh $pkgdir/usr/bin I also suggest you to add patch which skips user to wait when starting pycharm. You can do something like that: sed -i '/.*read IGNORE.*/ d' $pkgdir/opt/$pkgname/bin/pycharm.sh

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Next › Last »