AUR (en) - pycharm-professional

Search Criteria

Package Details: pycharm-professional 2024.1.1-1

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	pycharm-professional
Description:	Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition
Upstream URL:	https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/
Keywords:	development editor ide jetbrains python
Licenses:	custom
Submitter:	hippojazz
Maintainer:	Xavier (37h4n)
Last Packager:	Xavier
Votes:	286
Popularity:	0.81
First Submitted:	2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2024-05-01 20:08 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

pycharm-professional

Description:

Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition

Upstream URL:

https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/

Keywords:

development editor ide jetbrains python

Licenses:

custom

Submitter:

hippojazz

Maintainer:

Xavier (37h4n)

Last Packager:

Xavier

Votes:

286

Popularity:

0.81

First Submitted:

2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2024-05-01 20:08 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 43 Next › Last »

guiastro commented on 2023-03-13 18:19 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-13 18:25 (UTC) by guiastro)

==> Validating source files with sha256sums... pycharm-professional.desktop ... Passed charm.desktop ... Passed charm ... Passed ==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha256sums... pycharm-professional-2022.3.3.tar.gz ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! -> error making: pycharm-professional

.tar.gz error

Xavier commented on 2023-03-13 18:12 (UTC)

Hi @murchu27, I just checked and the sums are fine, then maybe your tar file downloaded is corrupted

murchu27 commented on 2023-03-13 17:46 (UTC)

Still getting the same error as @jrohwer. Did they change the tar file again?

Xavier commented on 2023-03-11 19:58 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-11 20:00 (UTC) by Xavier)

For some reason (maybe a last minute bug fixes), they changed the tar file, thanks for letting me know.

jrohwer commented on 2023-03-11 11:05 (UTC)

Checksum error when trying to build the latest version:

==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    pycharm-professional.desktop ... Passed
    charm.desktop ... Passed
    charm ... Passed
==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha256sums...
    pycharm-professional-2022.3.3.tar.gz ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
 -> error making: pycharm-professional

37h4n commented on 2023-02-15 18:41 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-15 18:41 (UTC) by 37h4n)

@XavierCLL I can help with that.

Xavier commented on 2023-02-15 00:47 (UTC)

Thanks Ethan for your contribution! I think I can include it but I don't have that architecture for testing it, could you report any future issues? that would be the only way.

37h4n commented on 2023-02-12 22:54 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-12 22:54 (UTC) by 37h4n)

I modified the PKGBUILD to add aarch64 support for 2022.3.2 for Asahi Linux users: https://bafybeiewzojopsrk5qtqhybwfth6s4ym7vrvlnmdomkc2jw4v2wha4sgeq.ipfs.kubo.sudoer.ch/?filename=2022.3.2-1.PKGBUILD (backup link)

It would be nice to see aarch64 support make its way into the main package.

Xavier commented on 2022-11-10 04:29 (UTC)

@tocic you'r right, that minor issue come from the Pycharm package, I'm going to check if that persists for the next version else I'll fix the permission to that file, thanks

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 43 Next › Last »

Arch Linux User Repository