Package Details: pycharm 2026.1.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pycharm
Description: The only Python IDE you need. Bundled with the official JetBrains Runtime (JBR)
Upstream URL: https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: pycharm-community-edition, pycharm-professional
Provides: pycharm
Replaces: pycharm-professional
Submitter: Xavier
Maintainer: Zpecter (Meaulnes)
Last Packager: Zpecter
Votes: 309
Popularity: 2.35
First Submitted: 2025-10-04 18:47 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-15 20:18 (UTC)

Dependencies (19)

Required by (0)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

Meaulnes commented on 2026-03-27 16:37 (UTC)

This comment from @AvacadoCookie should be pinned, IMO.

If anyone is getting errors about Cython or setuptools, and they are using Conda, that comment has the answer.

If anyone is getting errors about Cython or setuptools, and they are using pyenv, there are 2 possible ways to fix it:

  1. pyenv local system to set Python back to the system installed Python for this session.
  2. pip install Cython setuptools to install the necessary packages to your preferred python installation.

AvocadoCookie commented on 2025-12-14 16:22 (UTC)

For all users with ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'Cython' or 'setuptools' reported, please try the following methods to address the problem:

  1. Quit conda environment. Now after which python typed in console, the output should be /usr/bin/python.
  2. Try again.
  3. If the installation still failed, try again after pacman -S cython python-setuptools.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 48 Next › Last »

guiastro commented on 2023-03-13 18:19 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-13 18:25 (UTC) by guiastro)

==> Validating source files with sha256sums... pycharm-professional.desktop ... Passed charm.desktop ... Passed charm ... Passed ==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha256sums... pycharm-professional-2022.3.3.tar.gz ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! -> error making: pycharm-professional

.tar.gz error

Xavier commented on 2023-03-13 18:12 (UTC)

Hi @murchu27, I just checked and the sums are fine, then maybe your tar file downloaded is corrupted

murchu27 commented on 2023-03-13 17:46 (UTC)

Still getting the same error as @jrohwer. Did they change the tar file again?

Xavier commented on 2023-03-11 19:58 (UTC) (edited on 2023-03-11 20:00 (UTC) by Xavier)

For some reason (maybe a last minute bug fixes), they changed the tar file, thanks for letting me know.

jrohwer commented on 2023-03-11 11:05 (UTC)

Checksum error when trying to build the latest version:

==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    pycharm-professional.desktop ... Passed
    charm.desktop ... Passed
    charm ... Passed
==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha256sums...
    pycharm-professional-2022.3.3.tar.gz ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
 -> error making: pycharm-professional

37h4n commented on 2023-02-15 18:41 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-15 18:41 (UTC) by 37h4n)

@XavierCLL I can help with that.

Xavier commented on 2023-02-15 00:47 (UTC)

Thanks Ethan for your contribution! I think I can include it but I don't have that architecture for testing it, could you report any future issues? that would be the only way.

37h4n commented on 2023-02-12 22:54 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-12 22:54 (UTC) by 37h4n)

I modified the PKGBUILD to add aarch64 support for 2022.3.2 for Asahi Linux users: https://bafybeiewzojopsrk5qtqhybwfth6s4ym7vrvlnmdomkc2jw4v2wha4sgeq.ipfs.kubo.sudoer.ch/?filename=2022.3.2-1.PKGBUILD (backup link)

It would be nice to see aarch64 support make its way into the main package.

Xavier commented on 2022-11-10 04:29 (UTC)

@tocic you'r right, that minor issue come from the Pycharm package, I'm going to check if that persists for the next version else I'll fix the permission to that file, thanks

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 48 Next › Last »