Search Criteria
Package Details: r8125-dkms 9.017.01-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/r8125-dkms.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | r8125-dkms |
| Description: | Kernel module for RTL8125 |
| Upstream URL: | https://www.realtek.com/en/component/zoo/category/network-interface-controllers-10-100-1000m-gigabit-ethernet-pci-express-software |
| Licenses: | GPL2 |
| Conflicts: | r8125 |
| Submitter: | ptb |
| Maintainer: | aravance |
| Last Packager: | aravance |
| Votes: | 23 |
| Popularity: | 0.98 |
| First Submitted: | 2020-11-21 14:53 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2026-02-26 21:52 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- dkms (dkms-gitAUR)
- linux-headers (linux-mnt-reform-bin-headersAUR, linux-galaxyaudio-headers-binAUR) (optional) – Build the module for Arch kernel
- linux-lts-headers (optional) – Build the module for LTS Arch kernel
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »
vp1981 commented on 2026-01-25 04:49 (UTC)
@HurricanePootis, thank you.
I think I get what is wrong. I didn't use the original
dkms.conffile of the package, but changed theMAKEline as you suggested below, so right now I have the following fordkms.conf:It makes sense that if you are using something like
yay -S r8125-dkms(or similar), then you are using the originaldkms.confand
ENABLE_USE_FIRMWARE_FILEis not defined.So, should I assume that your suggestion was a bit more advanced, and I stumbled upon a code error?
HurricanePootis commented on 2026-01-23 03:27 (UTC)
@vp1981
I am able to install
r8125-dkmsand I don't experience any problems during compilation of the DKMS package. This is both onlinux,linux-zen,linux618-tkg-eevdf, andlinux-lts.vp1981 commented on 2026-01-23 02:41 (UTC)
Hello.
Has anyone encountered any issues with the current r8125-dkms version?
I prepared a package for my colleague and when he tried to install it, an error occurred compiling the file
r8125_n.c(the functionrtl8125_test_phy_ocp_v5, line 16593, call tortl8125_set_phy_mcu_8125d_1_efuse). I checked the code, and the functionrtl8125_set_phy_mcu_8125d_1_efuseis defined in the “conditionally compiled code” (#ifndef ENABLE_USE_FIRMWARE_FILE), and sincedkms.confdefines this variable, an error occurs during compilation.I managed to resolve the immediate issue with a minor fix.
However, I'm still curious if anyone else has faced a similar compilation error.
<deleted-account> commented on 2025-12-05 08:05 (UTC)
thank you for making this dkms package. it is the only working driver for my realtek ethernet controller:
evine commented on 2025-11-18 15:03 (UTC) (edited on 2025-11-20 04:22 (UTC) by evine)
This patch can fix errors that cannot be compiled in kernel 6.17+ for r8125 9.016.01.
Moonbase59 commented on 2025-08-15 12:21 (UTC)
Realtek just updated to v9.016.01 on 2025-08-15, see https://www.realtek.com/Download/List?cate_id=584.
Seems this driver is still needed for the RTL8125BG, couldn’t find the
bgvariant in the r8169 kernel sources yet.starblursd commented on 2025-06-03 01:10 (UTC) (edited on 2025-06-03 01:15 (UTC) by starblursd)
@HurricanePootis so i tried making this patch on my own but the sha256sums didnt pass check (im noob and may have botched it), generated new sha256sums, ran
makepkg -siand the build failed resulting in no ethernet... reinstalled the current version to get that back. im curious if the issue im having with steam download speed being up and down is related to the lack of the patch you're bringing up. i have 8125 revision 0cHurricanePootis commented on 2025-03-18 00:25 (UTC) (edited on 2025-03-18 00:31 (UTC) by HurricanePootis)
@aravance
Hello, in the
dkms.conffile, you are calling the Kernel module make directly. This, however, ignores the default flags and features realtek sets in theirMakefile. This patch enables the default features set inMakefile, such as Firmware support, Giga Lite, S5 WoL, etc. Ther8125-objshas to be manually defined as you cannot add to it like the extra_cflags from dkms.This patch also makes the
license()SPDX compliant.I have already went through this process with
r8168-dkms.erdnuesse commented on 2025-01-18 10:43 (UTC) (edited on 2025-01-18 10:44 (UTC) by erdnuesse)
I just said, I have external factors that are responsible. So I'm not even looking at linux/windows systems, but my network as a whole. None of my lxc containers on a different host get dynamic IPs anymore on the relevant VLAN /subnet in question. I didn't go into more detail, bc/ don't wat to hijack this package for my personal troubleshooting as my issue is outside of this package, the aur, even arch - so please no more OT, it's already bad enough as it is.
(if any admin wants me to delete the comments, happy to do so)
actionless commented on 2025-01-18 10:37 (UTC)
erdnuesse 1) what happens if you use r8169 kernel module instead? 2) what happens if you boot to windows? (nowadays you can install it for free without pirating)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »