Package Details: rslsync 2.8.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/rslsync.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: rslsync
Description: Resilio Sync (ex:BitTorrent Sync) - automatically sync files via secure, distributed technology
Upstream URL: https://www.getsync.com
Licenses: custom:resilio
Submitter: widowild
Maintainer: widowild (fryfrog)
Last Packager: fryfrog
Votes: 359
Popularity: 0.23
First Submitted: 2016-09-25 13:20 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-06 21:14 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 .. 56 Next › Last »

mart-e commented on 2015-03-04 15:41 (UTC)

Version 2 introduces a big restriction: maximum 10 synced folders for free users! It's ok for me but many people on bittorrent forums are asking how to downgrade. I expect 1.4 not to be maintained anymore. So I would say upgrade this one to 2.0 but making a package btsync-1 may interest some people (not sure if you can share folders under 1.4 with devices with 2.0)

auberginepop commented on 2015-03-04 15:32 (UTC)

Version 2 looks good though and any new features that come out will only go into 2. Why wait to upgrade?

lockheed commented on 2015-03-04 15:10 (UTC)

@auberginepop, you can install 1.4 apk downloaded from the internet manually and disconnect it from Android Market. This way it will always stay intact even with automatic updates on. I just did it myself. There is neither point nor necessity to going to v2. At least for the moment.

auberginepop commented on 2015-03-04 13:08 (UTC)

The btsync app on my Android phone has automatically updated to version 2 so I have no choice to upgrade to this version on all my other devices as and when it is available. Now 2 is out I suspect v1.4 will be dropped pretty soon anyway.

starquake commented on 2015-03-04 11:41 (UTC)

I am thinking of switching to some other solution. Syncthing is looking nice lately and they say it's stable and also ownCloud might be a good solution for me. Not te same as btsync though. Will report back if I made up my mind.

ava1ar commented on 2015-03-04 11:31 (UTC)

Any thoughts about what we should do with this package? Version 2.0 is out, but now this is a free version of the commercial product. Should we keep this package as i.e. btsync1 and create PKGBUILD for version 2 as btsync? Anybody plans to continue using 1.4? Let's wait couple of days to understand the future of 1.4 version - if it will stop working in the future, this package will be updated to version 2. If no, separate PKGBUILD will be created for version 2 and version 1 will be also available in the repository as i.e. btsync1. Comments?

bfr commented on 2015-02-20 10:10 (UTC)

@aminzai: Please read https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Prerequisites @threepointtwo: The PKGBUILD uses "./btsync --dump-sample-config" - so its using the newly extracted binary. /etc/btsync.conf is generated fine this way.

threepointtwo commented on 2015-02-19 16:15 (UTC)

the PKGBUILD uses the "btsync --dump-sample-config" command to create /etc/btsync.conf. this makes no sense as someone installing for the first time will not have the btsync command on their system. it created an empty config file for me and the service wouldn't start until i created a valid config.

aminzai commented on 2015-02-05 13:43 (UTC)

Hi: I found a lost require package "binutils" and "fakeroot" :)

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 .. 56 Next › Last »