Package Details: rslsync 3.0.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/rslsync.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: rslsync
Description: Resilio Sync (ex:BitTorrent Sync) - automatically sync files via secure, distributed technology
Upstream URL: https://www.getsync.com
Licenses: custom:resilio
Submitter: widowild
Maintainer: widowild (fryfrog)
Last Packager: fryfrog
Votes: 361
Popularity: 0.71
First Submitted: 2016-09-25 13:20 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-08-08 15:57 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 .. 56 Next › Last »

23ua commented on 2014-01-28 08:22 (UTC)

teek, I had similar problem. ___ systemctl status btsync@username ... Jan 28 10:07:45 ... btsync[5615]: Can't open pid file /var/lib/btsync/sync.pid. Permission denied ___ Try fixing permissions for /var/lib/btsync/sync.pid. It solved my issue.

teek commented on 2014-01-27 17:12 (UTC)

Btw, I'm using the file created by btsync-autoconfig, my kernel is 3.8.4-1-ARCH (not up to date because Digital Ocean (vps provider) does not like that)

teek commented on 2014-01-27 17:09 (UTC)

Dear all, btsync works well, when I: <i>sudo systemctl start btsync</i> It uses the values in /etc/btsync.conf, nice! (I can get to the webui at ip.a.d.dr:8888) But when I <i>sudo systemctl start btsync@user</i> (user being my username) Nothing happens, it is not using the values in ~./config/btsync/btsync.conf (So no webui at ip.a.d.dr:8889 or 8888). Any ideas?

ava1ar commented on 2014-01-07 00:36 (UTC)

Anyone else can reproduce problems, described by tes5884? Based on error description, I can assume, that you have problems with file download. Can you check, what is file size of the btsync archive? And check if it is not corrupted?

tes5884 commented on 2014-01-06 19:53 (UTC)

First, on my machine the sha1 for x64 is wrong. Second, if I bypass integrity check I get the following error; --- install: cannot stat 'btsync': No such file or directory ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package(). Aborting... --- Thanks!!

ava1ar commented on 2014-01-04 18:04 (UTC)

etes5884, this is rally strange, all checksums looks OK and works fine for me. Can you please post your checksums, just to compare.

tes5884 commented on 2014-01-03 02:14 (UTC)

I tried on virtualbox using x64, as well as my raspberry pi arm architecture.

ava1ar commented on 2014-01-03 01:52 (UTC)

What arch? Works for me, please provide details.

tes5884 commented on 2014-01-02 17:27 (UTC)

ava1ar Seems to be failing validity checks...