Package Details: ruby-rmagick 2.16.0-5

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: ruby-rmagick
Description: RMagick is an interface between the Ruby programming language and the ImageMagick image processing library
Upstream URL:
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: shtrom
Maintainer: dark-saber
Last Packager: dark-saber
Votes: 25
Popularity: 0.107197
First Submitted: 2009-02-25 04:53
Last Updated: 2018-02-09 09:31

Latest Comments

dark-saber commented on 2018-02-09 09:39

NeoRaider: Fixed, thanks!

NeoRaider commented on 2018-02-09 08:04

This is missing a dependency on ruby-rdoc:

==> Starting package()...             
Building native extensions. This could take a while...                  
Successfully installed rmagick-2.16.0
ERROR:  While executing gem ... (Gem::DocumentError)
    RDoc is not installed: cannot load such file -- rdoc/rdoc
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package().

dark-saber commented on 2018-01-04 07:10

I've made some tests and it looks like libmagick6 is enough to make this work, and it doesn't conflict to libmagick v7. Please let me know if you find something is wrong with new dependencies.

dark-saber commented on 2018-01-04 06:57

tuxsavvy: Yes, unfortunately, rmagick still doesn't support imagemagick 7+. Achieving the compatibility with v7 seems to be non-trivial, people have tried, but no one succeeded to this moment ( So the only relevant pull request is this:

There is also a mini_magick gem on GitHub: which is compatible with imagemagick 7+, uses less RAM and it's functionality might be enough for some tasks.

tuxsavvy commented on 2018-01-04 04:33

Does this package still require imagemagick6? According to the repository, supports were added to support imagemagick 6.9+:

RMagick 2.16.0
Support ImageMagick 6.9+ - @ZipoKing

imagemagic6 conflicts with imagemagick (which is already up to 7.0.7.xx)

shtrom commented on 2015-07-13 06:47

Here you go (:

dark-saber commented on 2015-07-13 06:45

@shtrom Yes, I'd like to maintain it.

shtrom commented on 2015-07-13 00:48

And the license IS MIT [0]. I fixed that too.


shtrom commented on 2015-07-13 00:46

Thanks for that Dmitry.

That said, I'm not really using this package anymore, so it is likely to go stale again. Care to take up maintainership?

dark-saber commented on 2015-07-11 15:08

Also, it seems that license is MIT.

All comments