Thanks @tealeaf. Good call. I've patched with the pull request, changing the executable name. Please let me know if it works (I don't use the scim package).
Search Criteria
Package Details: sc-im 0.8.3-2
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/sc-im.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | sc-im |
| Description: | A spreadsheet program based on SC |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/andmarti1424/sc-im |
| Licenses: | BSD |
| Conflicts: | sc-im-git, scim-spreadsheet |
| Submitter: | Rhinoceros |
| Maintainer: | Rhinoceros (andmarti1424) |
| Last Packager: | Rhinoceros |
| Votes: | 60 |
| Popularity: | 0.86 |
| First Submitted: | 2015-09-05 01:44 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-03-23 01:20 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- libxml2 (libxml2-gitAUR, libxml2-2.9AUR)
- libzip (libzip-gitAUR)
- gnuplot (gnuplot4AUR, gnuplot-gitAUR, gnuplot-noguiAUR, gnuplot-headlessAUR) (optional) – create graphs
- libxlsxwriterAUR (optional) – export to xlsx. Requires rebuild of sc-im
Required by (0)
Sources (2)
Rhinoceros commented on 2018-05-25 10:09 (UTC)
tealeaf commented on 2018-05-25 07:53 (UTC)
Ah, looks like an upstream change: https://github.com/andmarti1424/sc-im/pull/258
tealeaf commented on 2018-05-25 07:46 (UTC)
I notice that installing sc-im-git creates a binary at /usr/bin/sc-im, whilst this PKGBUILD produces /usr/bin/scim. Is that a naming change upstream, or has the scim name been implemented here?
The reason I ask is that /usr/bin/scim is a file conflict with the scim input method, which prevented me from installing both.
Looking at github, it does seem that the binary should be sc-im.
Rhinoceros commented on 2018-01-28 05:05 (UTC)
@armanleftarm Thanks for the feedback. Done.
armanleftarm commented on 2018-01-28 03:35 (UTC)
Add armv7h to the arch, builds proper on Samsung XE303C12
Rhinoceros commented on 2018-01-18 01:04 (UTC)
Good catch @aplund. Thank you and fixed.
aplund commented on 2018-01-18 00:42 (UTC)
Needs the following patch if BUILDDIR is set:
diff --git a/PKGBUILD b/PKGBUILD
index 800dc83..3a25dda 100644
--- a/PKGBUILD
+++ b/PKGBUILD
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ MAKEFLAGS='-j1'
prepare() {
cd "$pkgname-$pkgver/src"
# install things in the correct place for package managers
- patch <../../../arch.patch
+ patch < "$srcdir/arch.patch"
}
build() {
Rhinoceros commented on 2017-11-16 23:57 (UTC)
@Hund bison is part of `base-devel` [1], which is assumed to be installed and should not be in makedepends [2].
[1] https://www.archlinux.org/groups/x86_64/base-devel/
[2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#makedepends
<deleted-account> commented on 2017-11-16 18:06 (UTC)
I got this:
```
==> Starting build()...
which: no gnuplot in (/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/lib/jvm/default/bin:/usr/bin/site_perl:/usr/bin/vendor_perl:/usr/bin/core_perl)
yacc -d gram.y
make: yacc: Command not found
make: *** [Makefile:160: gram.c] Error 127
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
```
But I solved it by installing the package `bison`. It should be added to the makedepends.
Rhinoceros commented on 2017-05-09 11:47 (UTC)
Oh oops, I missed the difference between writer and reader. And xls and xlsx. Thanks for that information. I'm not sure how most people do it, but I only look at the optdepends after installation is complete, so I'm unsure how useful it'd be. Nevertheless, I'll add it to optdepends with the next version. Cheers.
Pinned Comments