Search Criteria
Package Details: sipp 3.5.2-1
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/sipp.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | sipp |
Description: | A free Open Source test tool / traffic generator for the SIP protocol. |
Upstream URL: | http://sipp.sourceforge.net/ |
Licenses: | |
Submitter: | None |
Maintainer: | ilmagno |
Last Packager: | xdevla |
Votes: | 19 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2009-10-12 11:04 |
Last Updated: | 2018-08-30 05:09 |
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
Baltazar72 commented on 2020-01-24 19:49
in addition to @deep_thought's comment I also had to do :
export CXX=/usr/bin/g++-8
To have it build correctly
deep_thought commented on 2019-07-09 12:11
this does not compile with gcc (version 9), but it does with gcc8:
josemslopes commented on 2017-06-29 13:13
I have the same issue with openssl.
I solved changing the build section of PGKBUILD with:
build() {
cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname}-${pkgver}"
sed -i 's/SSL_library_init/SSL_CTX_new/' configure.ac
sed -i 's/CRYPTO_num_locks/CRYPTO_free/' configure.ac
sed -i 's/TLSv1_method/TLS_method/' src/socket.cpp
./build.sh --with-pcap --with-sctp --with-openssl
}
This issue is caused because of openssl-1.1, i notice a workaround solution at https://github.com/SIPp/sipp/pull/304 .
notuxius commented on 2017-06-12 05:52
error upon build:
checking for SSL_library_init in -lssl... no
configure: error: ssl library missing
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
xdevla commented on 2015-07-31 14:10
Changed, thanks for noticing
bidulock commented on 2015-07-31 03:06
Package 3.4.0-2 depends on "openssl", however, --with-openssl flag is not being passed when building.
papo483 commented on 2013-12-01 13:33
New version out: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sipp/files/sipp/3.4/sipp-3.3.990.tar.gz
xdevla commented on 2013-03-29 07:12
Thanks, updated
senorsmile commented on 2013-03-28 17:56
New version out: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sipp/files/sipp/3.3/sipp-3.3.tar.gz/download
xdevla commented on 2010-06-01 07:17
Absolutely sure, even the md5sum is incorrect...