Package Details: sphinx 2.2.11-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/sphinx.git (read-only)
Package Base: sphinx
Description: Free open-source SQL full-text search engine.
Upstream URL: http://www.sphinxsearch.com/
Keywords: devel engine fulltext
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: None
Maintainer: cinatic
Last Packager: cinatic
Votes: 65
Popularity: 1.200669
First Submitted: 2008-05-26 00:46
Last Updated: 2016-08-06 08:43

Latest Comments

cinatic commented on 2016-08-22 12:40

hi user00265,

a split-build is not possible, a seperate package has to be created, if you are interested i can create a pkg?

user00265 commented on 2016-08-16 22:05

Is there any way this package could either get support for, or have a split-build for, libsphinxclient? I currently modified the PKGBUILD to just install it as part of the package, but I feel this might be either a different package or split-build.

cinatic commented on 2015-10-08 10:37

@peterhoeg
thx for the hint, i compared the install hook with those from mariadb and apache and decided now to change it in a slightly different way



peterhoeg commented on 2015-10-08 09:28

Both groupadd and useradd in sphinx.install should use the --system parameter so the sphinx user is created correctly.

Maybe add --shell /usr/bin/nologin as well?

cinatic commented on 2015-05-13 09:42

@scooter
uhm good question, i am not able to find the source for the search executable. I remember that i tried it once 1 year ago and got some troubles with the command line tools. Maybe they removed it now

IMO it is better to test it by mysql client:
-> mysql -P 9306 -h 127.0.0.1

For SphinxSE you should try workbench or another mysql client of your choice.

scooter commented on 2015-05-12 19:15

Hi there. I installed this, but it seems to be missing the "search" command. All the articles I read mention this command for console searching. Is there a reason it's missing? How do I get it?

cinatic commented on 2015-04-28 18:00

@Enverex
i updated the source and commented the user and group "sphinx" params, i think systemd user is sufficient for the daemon

Enverex commented on 2015-04-28 13:54

Is the service file correct? It claims it failed to start but it's running just fine. Should it be set to simple or some other service type?

Enverex commented on 2015-04-28 13:53

Is the service file correct? It claims it failed to start but it's running just fine. Should it be set to forking or some other service type?

cinatic commented on 2015-01-28 21:44

@dcelasun updated

i will check the services at the weekend

All comments