Package Details: spideroak-one 7.5.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/spideroak-one.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: spideroak-one
Description: Secure file backup, sync and sharing client. This provides the client for SpiderOakONE.
Upstream URL: https://crossclave.com/
Keywords: backup
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: spideroak, spideroak-beta
Provides: spideroak
Replaces: spideroak
Submitter: coolpyrofreak
Maintainer: mbc
Last Packager: mbc
Votes: 269
Popularity: 0.036298
First Submitted: 2015-07-18 19:17 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-09-04 21:57 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 27 Next › Last »

xcaramar commented on 2023-09-06 19:03 (UTC)

Couldn't get this to install yesterday, but tried again today and now it's downloading fine. Not sure what changed, but thank you!

xcaramar commented on 2023-09-04 21:59 (UTC)

Curl can grab the file fine in a regular terminal. Looks like the url in the PKGBUILD is incomplete? I've never created a PKGBUILD file before. But curl seems to report it tried to download the source without the file name.

curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 403
==> ERROR: Failure while downloading https://spideroak-releases.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com
Aborting...

xcaramar commented on 2023-09-04 21:33 (UTC)

Apologies. Just marked as out of date, because install still failing, but then I noticed the download link has actually been updated. Looks like curl is getting a 403 (Forbidden) error when attempting to download, although I can download using the same url from Spideroak's site without needing to log in. Not sure what's causing this.

mbc commented on 2023-01-22 18:56 (UTC)

I saw this package has been orphaned and decided to maintain it - it feels like SpiderOak might not be actively developing this anymore, but if they do, I can maintain it for now unless anyone else would prefer the job.

mxfm commented on 2021-03-13 06:38 (UTC)

@coolpyrofreak OK, I have adopted the package.

coolpyrofreak commented on 2021-03-12 15:11 (UTC)

@mxfm It's pretty straightforward. I tried to clean up the PKGBUILD when I took this over a while back, so I think it's easy to maintain.

mxfm commented on 2021-03-11 16:36 (UTC)

@coolpyrofreak perhaps I can maintain this package (I continue to use their service). Are there some packaging caveats?

coolpyrofreak commented on 2021-03-11 03:39 (UTC)

Hi all. I'm disowning this package because I've decided not to use the service anymore. Despite no new updates in a long time, the service and the application are both still supported upstream.

mxfm commented on 2019-01-05 18:43 (UTC)

@coolpyrofreak Well, this situation is indeed strange, I thought it was a new version.

I see links to other packages (rpm, windows, osx) were also rolled back to 7.3.0.1. It seems there is some bug in new version, but hope they will resolve somehow soon.

Even if they return 7.4 back, the sha256sum will likely be changed, so PKGBUILD will require adjustment anyway.