Search Criteria
Package Details: sublime-text-2 2.0.2-2
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/sublime-text-2.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | sublime-text-2 |
Description: | Sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose (legacy version) |
Upstream URL: | https://www.sublimetext.com/2 |
Licenses: | custom: commercial |
Submitter: | SunRed |
Maintainer: | carstene1ns |
Last Packager: | SunRed |
Votes: | 543 |
Popularity: | 0.000001 |
First Submitted: | 2022-11-15 17:00 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-11-15 17:00 (UTC) |
Dependencies (6)
- bash (bash-devel-static-gitAUR, bash-devel-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR, bash-gitAUR)
- desktop-file-utils (desktop-file-utils-gitAUR)
- gtk2 (gtk2-maemoAUR, gtk2-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR)
- libpng (libpng-apngAUR, libpng-gitAUR)
- shared-mime-info
- xdg-utils (busking-gitAUR, xdg-utils-slockAUR, mimiAUR, mimi-gitAUR, xdg-utils-handlrAUR, openerAUR, xdg-utils-mimeoAUR, mimejs-gitAUR)
Required by (0)
Sources (10)
- 0001-libpng16-Avoid-dereferencing-NULL-pointer-possibly-r.patch
- 0002-libpng16-Calculate-our-own-zlib-windowBits-when-deco.patch
- adjust-apng-patch-for-libpng16-git-changes.patch
- http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libpng-apng/libpng-1.6.2-apng.patch.gz
- http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libpng/libpng-1.6.2.tar.xz
- https://download.sublimetext.com/Sublime%20Text%202.0.2%20x64.tar.bz2
- https://download.sublimetext.com/Sublime%20Text%202.0.2.tar.bz2
- sublime-text-2-EULA
- sublime-text-2.desktop
- sublime-text-2.sh
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 16 Next › Last »
carstene1ns commented on 2021-05-13 13:05 (UTC)
You are free to create the renamed package and send a merge request. Please stop flagging and being rude.
NullRoute commented on 2021-05-01 05:19 (UTC)
I agree with relrel, it should be renamed to "sublime-text-2" and also should NOT force users to remove "sublime-text-3" it should be installed to "subl2" and NOT as "subl" which breaks "sublime-text-3" install. This two packages can easierly be run side by side and there absolutely no reason to force users one or the other. Some of us like to use both, especially if we paid for the license.
relrel commented on 2020-10-16 14:41 (UTC)
This package should be renamed to
sublime-text-2
, to be consistent withsublime-text-3
.TheChickenMan commented on 2017-09-19 13:50 (UTC)
davidgxxl commented on 2017-09-18 21:11 (UTC)
carstene1ns commented on 2017-09-14 14:04 (UTC)
jkwill87 commented on 2017-09-13 22:09 (UTC)
nathan-osman commented on 2017-09-13 16:42 (UTC)
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 16 Next › Last »