Package Details: texmacs-qt 2.1.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/texmacs-qt.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: texmacs-qt
Description: WYSIWYG free scientific text editor and graphical frontend to various CASes \n (Giac, GTybalt, Macaulay 2, Maxima, Octave, Pari, Qcl, R and Yacas)
Upstream URL: http://texmacs.org/
Licenses: GPL3
Submitter: None
Maintainer: chelqo
Last Packager: chelqo
Votes: 8
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2009-04-10 07:43 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-02-06 03:18 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

carlosal1015 commented on 2023-01-11 17:57 (UTC)

Hi, someone knows if the texmacs-qt package is working with guile2.2 or guile. Thanks.

chelqo commented on 2022-11-03 02:16 (UTC)

It is an interesting case, I could not say why it is due, I have not worked with vector image in pdf format, I will try to figure out what is the origin of this behavior.

Could you tell me which package contains the qt_convert_image command? I can't find it in my system.

What distro do you use?

medwatt commented on 2022-11-01 12:41 (UTC)

I am facing one issue which I hope you can have a look at. In TeXmacs, if you insert a vector image in pdf format, TeXmacs first converts the image to png using ghostscript and then inserts the png into the document. Even though I have ghostscript installed, the TeXmacs built from this aur package does not find ghostscript and instead uses qt to convert the image, which is usually in a very low resolution. I know this issue is from ghoscript not being found because I enabled debugging when converting the image and got the message below. Can you please have a look at the way at why TeXmacs built from this package is not able to fond ghostscript.

TeXmacs] debug-convert, image_to_png ...  using qt 
TeXmacs] debug-convert, qt_convert_image /home/medwatt/sample.pdf -> /home/medwatt/.TeXmacs/system/tmp/181386/tmp_63472292.png

chelqo commented on 2022-06-26 00:22 (UTC)

I think that idea does not apply in this case. Both packages are made up of the same file content, so they are even the same size. The scripts to build both packages are almost identical, the only difference is that latex is not a dependency (latex isn't even a build requirement).

haawda commented on 2022-06-13 23:25 (UTC)

According to your latest comment you should maybe choose a name which reflects the purpose better - say, texmacs-minimal.

chelqo commented on 2022-05-02 21:04 (UTC)

Hi @slbtty, there are no big differences.

I keep this branch because it allows me to install on machines with limited resources (like mine), without the need for latex to be a mandatory dependency (texlive-core).

slbtty commented on 2022-04-19 16:33 (UTC)

Is there any critical difference between this and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/texmacs ?

chelqo commented on 2020-01-30 00:37 (UTC)

I just saw that the comments jump from the date 2013 to 2020. Does anyone know why the posts of all those years were lost?

chelqo commented on 2020-01-30 00:32 (UTC)

Right. As I see in the site of texmacs they have re-uploaded the source code without modifying the version number, adding a directory that contains the program guile version 1.6.8, but that does not participate in the compilation, the current PKGBUILD still works exactly the same.

Without modifying the version of the PKGBUILD, the checksum is already corrected.

aiezue commented on 2020-01-28 06:45 (UTC)

md5sum check failed as to version 1.99.12

1 2 3 Next › Last »