Search Criteria
Package Details: uefi-shell-git 32718.edk2.stable202405.156.g3b2025969e-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/uefi-shell-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | uefi-shell-git |
Description: | UEFI Shell v2 - from Tianocore EDK2 - GIT Version |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/tianocore/edk2 |
Licenses: | BSD |
Conflicts: | uefi-shell, uefi-shell-svn |
Provides: | uefi-shell |
Submitter: | ka2107 |
Maintainer: | Flubbadub |
Last Packager: | Flubbadub |
Votes: | 51 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2015-07-22 00:17 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-06-29 09:54 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »
GeneArch commented on 2019-09-01 19:34 (UTC) (edited on 2019-09-01 19:35 (UTC) by GeneArch)
Getting Error now: src/edk2/Build/Shell/RELEASE_GCC5/X64/Shell.efi': No such file or director
Directory contains these now not Shell.efi 900 src/edk2/Build/Shell/RELEASE_GCC5/X64/Shell_7C04A583-9E3E-4f1c-AD65-E05268D0B4D1.efi 968 src/edk2/Build/Shell/RELEASE_GCC5/X64/Shell_EA4BB293-2D7F-4456-A681-1F22F42CD0BC.efi
Not sure what the difference is or if one of them is what we should now be using?
Build went fine, this error is in install phase
SanderMaijers commented on 2018-08-10 12:49 (UTC)
Hello71 commented on 2018-08-05 22:34 (UTC)
Although, installing it directly to /boot is not a good idea, because it may not be on the ESP. I would prefer an installer program, like bootctl or memtest86-efi.
Hello71 commented on 2018-08-05 22:33 (UTC)
I didn't write it, I only adopted it and made minor changes to make it compilable. If I was revamping it I'd get rid of all the unnecessary functions and probably get rid of i686 support. Patches accepted.
skunk commented on 2018-08-05 19:45 (UTC)
Or, Hello71, phrased as question: Why do you install the efi file to
/usr
and not to/boot
directly (admittedly, one would need to check, whether to install it to/boot
,/efi
or/boot/efi
, but this seems to be do-able)?skunk commented on 2018-08-05 19:40 (UTC)
Hi @Hello71, what do you think about adding a pointer on what to do with the compiled .efi binary? For example, in the
post_install
message, one could add something likeA bit lengthy, but could help people, who do not know too much about UEFI, what to do with it...
Cheers
cg505 commented on 2018-06-23 14:18 (UTC)
Heads up: the listed upstream URL doesn't exist any more. Seems like it should be updated to GitHub? No issues with the actual package though, thanks!
mike.cloaked commented on 2017-09-09 13:20 (UTC)
GeneArch commented on 2017-08-31 14:52 (UTC)
GeneArch commented on 2017-08-31 14:07 (UTC)
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »