Package Details: wine-git 9.1.r52.ge3431a02e1d-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/wine-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: wine-git
Description: A compatibility layer for running Windows programs (git version)
Upstream URL: https://www.winehq.org/
Keywords: windows wine
Licenses: LGPL
Conflicts: bin32-wine, wine, wine-wow64
Provides: bin32-wine, wine, wine-wow64
Replaces: bin32-wine
Submitter: None
Maintainer: dbermond
Last Packager: dbermond
Votes: 86
Popularity: 0.001578
First Submitted: 2007-07-18 16:01 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-01-31 02:36 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last »

sxe commented on 2010-12-18 11:53 (UTC)

For me it works both ways, with and without "master" added. Anyway i updated the PKGBUILD to make it working for all again. thx for the tip Ockonal.

<deleted-account> commented on 2010-12-17 17:23 (UTC)

Failed to fetch source from git with latest pkgbuild. Edit PKGBUILD-file, find line `cd $pkgname && git pull origin` and add `master`. It should be like: `cd $pkgname && git pull origin master` now.

sxe commented on 2010-12-11 18:57 (UTC)

i'm the new maintainer, so hopefully the pakage works for all of you guys.

sxe commented on 2010-12-06 20:52 (UTC)

I sent intellitech a mail. We'll see if he responses otherwise a AUR admin has to change the PKGBUILD.

lubosz commented on 2010-12-06 20:16 (UTC)

With sxe's PKGBUILD i was able to build wine in arch64 for the first time, without any chroot. $ wine --version wine-1.3.8-291-g0a55ec2 There is no reason for intellitech's PKGBUILD to exist. Arch changed the whole handling of multilib since this pkgbuild was written. Please replace it with the actually working one.

lubosz commented on 2010-12-06 19:53 (UTC)

Dependency `lib32-dbus' of `wine-git' does not exist.

sxe commented on 2010-11-23 10:33 (UTC)

like i said, mine is based on the multilib/wine PKGBUILD. I think thats the reason.

<deleted-account> commented on 2010-11-23 06:35 (UTC)

I was looking over intellitech and sxe's PKGBUILDs, why do they have different dependencies?

sxe commented on 2010-10-20 15:33 (UTC)

your welcome. :) So we need at least one 32 bit tester before i can get in touch with intellitech to replace its PKGBUILD with mine.

<deleted-account> commented on 2010-10-20 14:13 (UTC)

I've tested the sxe's PKGBUILD on my arch64 and works fine! I vote to replace the PKGBUILD. Great job sxe! ;D

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last »