Package Details: x264-git 161.r3042.gb3aadb76-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/x264-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: x264-git
Description: Open Source H.264/AVC video encoder (git version)
Upstream URL: https://www.videolan.org/developers/x264.html
Keywords: avc h.264 h264 libx264 mpeg mpeg-4 mpeg4
Licenses: GPL
Conflicts: libx264, libx264-10bit, libx264-all, x264
Provides: libx264, libx264-git, libx264.so, x264
Replaces: libx264-10bit-git, libx264-all-git, libx264-git
Submitter: pressh
Maintainer: dbermond
Last Packager: dbermond
Votes: 237
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2008-03-18 09:05 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2021-01-27 22:31 (UTC)

Dependencies (4)

Required by (168)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 6 7 8 9 10 11

DrZaius commented on 2010-12-26 19:05 (UTC)

I do not have the same namcap results as you. I can get your results only if I install x264-git, ffmpeg-svn, and then x264-git. x264-git does not depend on ffmpeg. ffmpeg is an optional dependency if you want lavf support.

rafmav commented on 2010-12-26 17:52 (UTC)

namcap messages: x264-git E: Dependency detected and not included (ffmpeg) from files ['usr/bin/x264'] x264-git W: Dependency included but already satisfied ('glibc') and dependencies are circular (ffmpeg-svn depends on x264-git, and x264-git depends on ffmpeg) Thanks for this package.

<deleted-account> commented on 2010-08-13 12:51 (UTC)

Please fix the provides fix (If environment is different of en_US): provides=("x264=`LANG=C pacman -Si x264 | grep Version | awk '{ print $NF }'`")

DrZaius commented on 2010-08-03 01:11 (UTC)

@mar77i I updated the provides and my test worked. Definitely not an optimal solution, but neither is the bug comment. I'd rather extra/gstreamer0.10-ugly-plugins included the > like all of its other depends. Manually changing the provides every time extra/x264 is updated would be a pain in the ass, but otherwise my hackish provides may cause some issues. If it doesn't work as expected change the x264-git provides to match the current extra/x264 version as the bug comment shows.

mar77i commented on 2010-07-29 12:01 (UTC)

http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20313 Not really getting why, but it seems this is concerning you.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 6 7 8 9 10 11