Package Details: xf86-video-intel-git 1:2.99.917+916+g31486f40-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/xf86-video-intel-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: xf86-video-intel-git
Description: X.org Intel i810/i830/i915/945G/G965+ video drivers
Upstream URL: https://01.org/linuxgraphics
Keywords: git intel xf86 xorg xserver
Licenses: custom
Groups: xorg-drivers-git
Conflicts: xf86-video-i810, xf86-video-intel, xf86-video-intel-legacy, xf86-video-intel-sna, xf86-video-intel-uxa, xorg-server
Provides: xf86-video-intel, xf86-video-intel-sna, xf86-video-intel-uxa
Replaces: xf86-video-intel-sna, xf86-video-intel-uxa
Submitter: None
Maintainer: yurikoles (JstKddng)
Last Packager: yurikoles
Votes: 118
Popularity: 0.013992
First Submitted: 2008-07-27 16:36 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-09-22 10:56 (UTC)

Dependencies (21)

Required by (7)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

yurikoles commented on 2018-05-19 00:12 (UTC) (edited on 2020-05-28 12:04 (UTC) by yurikoles)

PRs are welcome: github://yurikoles/xf86-video-intel-git

Binary builds is available in chaotic-aur repo, which is kindly provided by @PedroHLC.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last »

anrxc commented on 2013-09-18 18:21 (UTC)

DRI2 should be fixed since September 9th in this commit: commit f25235a854e211f73cc44821b9a7c2a1a4092155 configure: Only assert DRI2 requirements not met if the DRI2 package is missing

anrxc commented on 2013-09-11 19:27 (UTC)

Thanks solidsnake. I'm under some deadlines at work, I'll figure out why we're no longer compatible as soon as I can.

sollidsnake commented on 2013-09-07 21:57 (UTC)

I got this error: configure: error: DRI2 requested but prerequisites not found It was caused by the the --enable-dri option (line 45) in PKGBUILD.

anrxc commented on 2013-05-06 00:43 (UTC)

2.21.6.23.gab576a4-3: Reverted to librdm in [extra]. Built against mesa, libgl, intel-dri v9.1.2. Tested on Sandybridge GT2 (GMA HD-3000).

Marcel_K commented on 2013-05-03 15:13 (UTC)

It's all yours, now. And about libdrm-git: I don't know, when I took maintainance over from Thomas Dziedzic it was already like that. Perhaps it still needs features only available in the Git version, perhaps not.

anrxc commented on 2013-05-01 15:21 (UTC)

I've been using git drivers for 4 or 5 years (wanting acceleration engine fixes, and power management/suspend fixes...) and I'd keep it maintained. But one thing surprised me, linking to libdrm-git vs. libdrm - is it because of SNA? (In other words, I may not know enough about graphics drivers if I don't know this)