Search Criteria
Package Details: xpadneo-dkms-git 0.9.r54.g7d1e6fd-4
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/xpadneo-dkms-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | xpadneo-dkms-git |
Description: | Advanced Linux Driver for Xbox One Wireless Gamepad |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/atar-axis/xpadneo |
Licenses: | GPL |
Conflicts: | xpadneo-dkms |
Provides: | xpadneo-dkms |
Submitter: | yangtsesu |
Maintainer: | joeleg |
Last Packager: | joeleg |
Votes: | 46 |
Popularity: | 1.03 |
First Submitted: | 2018-06-12 16:34 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2021-04-03 00:38 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »
deemon commented on 2020-11-12 13:10 (UTC)
and the log does say:
deemon commented on 2020-11-12 13:08 (UTC)
xrayfur commented on 2020-11-11 13:00 (UTC)
Works now, thanks @joeleg!
xrayfur commented on 2020-11-09 16:06 (UTC) (edited on 2020-11-09 16:09 (UTC) by xrayfur)
Broken after: https://github.com/atar-axis/xpadneo/commit/777934fd769971e9541591a2f8147355a7be616e
Lucki commented on 2020-07-14 23:53 (UTC)
The sed replacement fails:
katt commented on 2020-07-13 16:06 (UTC)
Hi, could you make this provide and conflict with xpadneo-dkms? https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_package_guidelines#Guidelines
Also since upstream decided to slap a "v" at the start of their versions, could you do something about that too? Cheers.
deemon commented on 2020-04-22 23:22 (UTC) (edited on 2020-04-24 14:44 (UTC) by deemon)
Ran into problem with this not adding/building itself after adding kernel 5.6 or 5.7 for respective kernels. Reinstalling xpadneo (AFTER installing kernel 5.6 or 5.7) fixed the problem. Dunno why the order matters here.
yangtsesu commented on 2020-01-09 00:04 (UTC)
@maxbla It is not suggested.
@deemon It is a git package. Package version is updated everytime you run makepkg -s.
deemon commented on 2020-01-04 00:03 (UTC)
reported package version seems to be wrong. instead of 0.5.4.r336.g5a2a53a-2 installed gets 0.6.0.r404.g4414f98-1
Lucki commented on 2019-09-10 08:04 (UTC) (edited on 2019-09-11 11:55 (UTC) by Lucki)
I've noticed the configuration file in
/etc/udev/rules.d/
gets overwritten on a kernel update which is probably not ideal for a configuration file. At first I thought that using pacmans backup would help but the file gets overwritten by the dkms rule. Maybe a placing the file in/usr/lib/udev/rules.d/
helps to recognize that this is not a file which should be edited? Followingsed
and placing the file there is untested:« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »