Search Criteria
Package Base Details: backintime-git
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/backintime-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Submitter: | willemw |
Maintainer: | willemw |
Last Packager: | willemw |
Votes: | 28 |
Popularity: | 0.000019 |
First Submitted: | 2015-10-15 03:28 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-02-24 16:00 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »
Rhinoceros commented on 2019-04-02 20:52 (UTC)
check() is fine for me, with the latest
1.1.12.r449.gba37b1e7-1
, usingmakepkg
. I do get some warnings, but no error.graysky commented on 2019-04-02 20:46 (UTC)
Anyone else failing the following test?
Rhinoceros commented on 2018-12-20 22:02 (UTC)
As per my previous comment, I think @willemw can remove the out-of-date flag.
Rhinoceros commented on 2018-11-09 10:31 (UTC)
I think pkgver is fine. It's pulling from the master branch, which is correct. The problem is that the stable release 1.1.24 is on a separate branch
series1.1
, presumably because upstream are rolling hotfixes into older versions without upgrading the stable with all the newer features.I think @willemw's advice is right though; just reinstall. It doesn't make sense to upgrade the epoch, for example, because the previous tag on the master is 1.1.12.
willemw commented on 2018-11-09 10:09 (UTC) (edited on 2018-11-09 10:19 (UTC) by willemw)
@uffe: There is an issue with pkgver(). It's not getting the latest tag anymore.
You can reinstall all your backintime*-git packages to upgrade to the latest commit. This is independent from version number generated by pkgver().
uffe commented on 2018-11-09 09:50 (UTC)
Hello I'm trying to get away from the aur/backintime package as it uses qt4 - Hence I would like to use this package (aur/backintime-git) - because of its qt5 dependency. But this package is at version 1.1.12 is behind the aur/backintime package (1.1.24). And I do not really like the idea of downgrading to an older version of backintime - risking the integrity my existing backups. Are there any plans to get this package up to 1.1.24 ? Thanks
willemw commented on 2018-11-05 15:26 (UTC)
@Jino: Building this package with makepkg (in a clean chroot) and don't see this error. Are you using an AUR helper? Try building in a clean chroot environment or directly with makepkg.
'gocryptfs' is not a dependency. Will remove those comments. 'python-pyqt5' is already in 'depends'. No need to declare it in 'checkdepends'.
Jino commented on 2018-11-05 13:59 (UTC) (edited on 2018-11-05 14:06 (UTC) by Jino)
I am experiencing an error when building:
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'PyQt5'
I see the line
checkdepends=('gocryptfs')
to be commented. Shouldn´ t this line beeing uncommented and 'python-pyqt5' to be added as checkdepend?
willemw commented on 2018-02-19 20:56 (UTC)
bab0: Should be fixed now.
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »