Package Base Details: jdk

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy)
Submitter: td123
Maintainer: dbermond
Last Packager: dbermond
Votes: 1086
Popularity: 0.197877
First Submitted: 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-04-26 00:51 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)

  • Important notice:

As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 .. 81 Next › Last »

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-05-07 02:27 (UTC)

jre6 is instaled in /opt/java6/jre and jre7 (this) is intalled in /opt/java7/jre, right? in this case, why jre7 (this) conflict w jre6 if both are installed in differents paths????

Det commented on 2012-05-04 11:54 (UTC)

So I guess this is a 'left' issue for my part, eh?: ┌┌(det@Archlinux)┌(424/pts/0)┌(01:12pm:05/04/12)┌- └┌(%:~)┌- ls -l /usr/share/applications/java-monitoring-and-management-console.desktop -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 168 May 4 10:31 /usr/share/applications/java-monitoring-and-management-console.desktop I don't know what's wrong with your system (or the build for that matter) because I still can't reproduce that here, but updated anyway. Also you don't need to use the word 'please', as long as it's something sane you're asking.

seblu commented on 2012-05-04 09:58 (UTC)

Right issues: $ ll /usr/share/applications/java-monitoring-and-management-console.desktop -rw------- 1 root root 168 2012-05-03 16:15 /usr/share/applications/java-monitoring-and-management-console.desktop please use install with right in your PKGBUILD instead of cp

Det commented on 2012-05-02 12:56 (UTC)

The http://uni-smr.ac.ru guys have caught up.

Det commented on 2012-05-02 12:56 (UTC)

The http://uni-smr.ac.ru guys have caught up.

Det commented on 2012-05-01 18:39 (UTC)

Sigh. The bloody download isn't this way because I wanna respect Oracle. It's this way because _there is no other way_.

nickoe commented on 2012-05-01 15:31 (UTC)

Where in the license does oracle state that the user has to download it directly and manually accepting the license? http://java.com/license

sjakub commented on 2012-04-30 20:13 (UTC)

I just tried both jre and jdk on a machine that was not updated yet. There were no problems, and the process is actually really nice. The loop was indeed a great idea and it works awesome. Thank you and keep up the good work! :) (As a side note, I can't believe how arrogant company Oracle is :/ )

Det commented on 2012-04-30 14:37 (UTC)

That's the spirit. You're welcome.

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-04-30 01:55 (UTC)

Working well now. Thanks for the fast fix! :) ~Eric