Package Details: jdk 11.0.1-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: jdk
Description: Oracle Java Development Kit
Upstream URL:
Keywords: java-environment-jdk java-openjfx java-runtime-headless-jre java-runtime-jre java-web-start-jre
Licenses: custom
Provides: java-environment=11, java-environment-jdk=11
Submitter: td123
Maintainer: dbermond
Last Packager: dbermond
Votes: 790
Popularity: 4.728966
First Submitted: 2011-08-27 17:56
Last Updated: 2018-12-12 12:53

Required by (753)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

NinjaKoala commented on 2018-12-17 11:34

This package has a conflicting file with extra/jdk7-openjdk: jdk: /usr/share/applications/jconsole.desktop exists in filesystem (owned by jdk7-openjdk)

dbermond commented on 2018-12-12 15:33

@proft The runtime environment is now at package jre, which is a dependency. Uninstall jdk first and it will work.

proft commented on 2018-12-12 15:30

error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) jre: /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-jdk/bin/java exists in filesystem (owned by jdk) jre: /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-jdk/bin/jjs exists in filesystem (owned by jdk) jre: /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-jdk/bin/jrunscript exists in filesystem (owned by jdk)

Det commented on 2018-11-24 12:37

Good-bye, friends.

I've left Arch a long time ago, and now I'm leaving these too.

To you.

Det commented on 2018-09-28 06:35

I didn't see it.

Someone can pacman -Ql jdk | grep jcontrol.

grawity commented on 2018-09-28 04:39

Just checking – does Java 11 no longer have the jcontrol control panel? (I think that's how I used to have to add custom CA certificates in the past.)

Det commented on 2018-09-27 18:56

Well... yeah.

They mention it (the new license) with a big yellow note in the Downloads page:

I could add an .install note, if people really use Arch Linux for Java production..

E: I mean, people are familiar with Google v. Oracle, right? Reading the new license, I didn't know this was anything new even.

severach commented on 2018-09-27 18:53

Oracle's Java 11 trap

Det commented on 2018-09-27 18:50

Yeah. The new JavaFX is apparently: (8.u172-2)

apemanzilla commented on 2018-09-27 18:38

JDK 11 no longer includes JavaFX, could the PKGBUILD be updated to reflect this?