Package Base Details: linux-ck

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 421
Popularity: 4.47
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51
Last Updated: 2020-01-20 21:18

Packages (2)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2019-12-31 18:48

Ah, you were asking for a build in [repo-ck]. I can add on with 5.4.7-1-ck.

trthomps commented on 2019-12-31 16:19

@graysky - ah, yes I know I can build my own, was hoping to get a pre-build binary ;-)

Happy to contribute cpu time if that's needed for repo-ck

graysky commented on 2019-12-31 10:28

@trthomps - You can ... it is option 12. See the PKGBUILD.

trthomps commented on 2019-12-31 09:13

Would it be possible to add a zen2 build as well? I'm running zen successfully but it looks like amd added additional optimizations for the latest zen 2 arch.

[travis@travis-pc ~]$ gcc -c -Q -march=native --help=target | grep march
  -march=                           znver2
  Known valid arguments for -march= option:

blazessdd commented on 2019-12-20 12:05

can't add comment a long comment... even if if i code put it in code code

graysky commented on 2019-12-12 17:46

@blazessdd - Can you post a build log and link it here?

blazessdd commented on 2019-12-12 16:01

i have set _localmodcfg=y but whenever i try to compile modprobed wont show up and i get a kernel with all the modules compile what can i do?

graysky commented on 2019-11-28 14:14

@Althorion -

# Note - the march=native option is unavailable by this method, use the nconfig
# and manually select it.

Althorion commented on 2019-11-28 13:13

Tired with clean PKGBUILD and -march=native (option 31). Manual patching works just fine, no idea why.

BTW (unrelated problem, I think), I tried manually patching the sources, removing patching from the PKGBUILD, and when I put some value for _subarch=, it fails at make oldconfig—it tries giving it the value I put in _subarch= (that would be 31), thus entering the never-ending loop of wrong arguments.

Finally, I managed to successfully build the package by manual patching and giving it empty _subarch.

graysky commented on 2019-11-28 13:06

Need more to go on in order to reproduce. Any edits to the PKGBUILD? Which number are you selecting on the gcc patch stage?