Search Criteria
Package Base Details: linux-ck
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Submitter: | graysky |
Maintainer: | graysky |
Last Packager: | graysky |
Votes: | 461 |
Popularity: | 0.95 |
First Submitted: | 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-03-16 18:02 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 .. 305 Next › Last »
graysky commented on 2020-08-21 13:15 (UTC)
5.7.17 introduces some changes that break the ck1 patch. If someone wants to take a look at that and share a solution, that would be good. I am busy at the moment.
enihcam commented on 2020-08-20 23:19 (UTC)
https://ck-hack.blogspot.com/2020/08/more-delays-and-motivation-issues.html
graysky commented on 2020-08-20 17:27 (UTC) (edited on 2020-08-20 17:27 (UTC) by graysky)
Yes, I fucked it up, should be fixed with https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=linux-ck&id=473e18c7ccdec2e641eab76ffcf93e87ff6140a1
You don't need to rebuild unless you have [testing] enabled or have it enabled in a clean build root btw.
Kr1ss commented on 2020-08-20 17:11 (UTC) (edited on 2020-08-20 17:16 (UTC) by Kr1ss)
The recent
pkgrel
bump broke the validity of theconfig
checksum, @graysky. Could you update that pls ?Thank you !
air-g4p commented on 2020-08-09 15:18 (UTC) (edited on 2020-08-09 15:25 (UTC) by air-g4p)
@graysky - 5.7.14-1-ck compiled and installed without issue. Good work, done here!
Kr1ss commented on 2020-08-07 13:02 (UTC)
@graysky I'm running
5.7.14-1-ck
right now, built w/localmodconfig
.Looks fine so far, thx.
graysky commented on 2020-08-07 12:39 (UTC)
I cannot reboot now so can someone verify that 5.7.14-ck1 is working properly for me? A small adjustment to ck1 was required.
mrkline commented on 2020-07-31 01:06 (UTC) (edited on 2020-07-31 01:07 (UTC) by mrkline)
Inexplicably, this I ran into the SHA256 issue on one of my machines but not the other. I diffed the two versions of
unfuck-ck1.patch
- check it out:It seems like https://github.com/ckolivas/linux/commit/0b69e633d6b0b08ae8547dc4099c8c0985019553.patch is inconsistent in how many digits of the Git SHAs it sends.
vltr commented on 2020-07-27 15:27 (UTC)
I think it's just a wild guess (or just my guts), but I think this might be some caching problem when downloading that particular file. Sometimes you might get it from a different server with a different content (even though this is odd, yes), but might explain why sometimes (and how inconsistently) this happens ...
air-g4p commented on 2020-07-27 05:15 (UTC) (edited on 2020-07-27 05:17 (UTC) by air-g4p)
@graysky and @artafinde: Thanks for trying to reproduce on your respective ends.
Inexplicably, the build completed without any PKGBUILD SHA256 modifications on my other laptop, and again running
makepkg -sric
. I suppose this success is consistent with @artafinde's '50% of the time' finding when runningmakepkg -sric
.Cheers guys...
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 .. 305 Next › Last »