Package Base Details: linux-ck

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only)
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 405
Popularity: 5.748043
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51
Last Updated: 2019-05-16 20:56

Packages (2)

Det commented on 2011-08-24 21:40

@graysky, these: http://pastebin.com/6jr7yPzS

>To echo what I posted earlier, if 2.6 --> 3.0 was that simple, I would think that Paolo would have done it already.
I wouldn't know about that but it's possible that Paolo simply hasn't got the time yet to even look at it (even if it was that simple a port). For what it's worth I'm using BFQ here (through the -pf patchset) and have had no issues so far.

Det commented on 2011-08-24 21:24

@graysky, these: http://pastebin.com/6jr7yPzS

>To echo what I posted earlier, if 2.6 --> 3.0 was that simple, I would think that Paolo would have done it already.
I wouldn't know about that but it's possible that Paolo hasn't got the time yet to look at it (even if it was that simple). For what it's worth I'm using BFQ here (through the -pf patchset) and have had no issues so far.

graysky commented on 2011-08-24 19:10

@Det - Pill in which changes? Also, I'm not comfortable using code that Paolo doesn't release. To echo what I posted earlier, if 2.6 --> 3.0 was that simple, I would think that Paolo would have done it already.

Det commented on 2011-08-24 12:37

@graysky, can you please finally "pull in" my "changes" :D?

E: And about BFQ, it may just be as easy as eduardoeae suggests. Based on this comment in CK's blog Paolo hasn't found the time yet to do the port: http://ck-hack.blogspot.com/2011/08/300-ck1-and-bfs-for-300.html?showComment=1313153893932#c8254692818264991921

Det commented on 2011-08-24 12:13

@graysky, can you please finally "pull in" my "changes" :D?

graysky commented on 2011-08-23 20:58

@ed - thanks for the enthusiasm but I'll wait for Paolo to post it. I would think that if it were as simple as what you propose, he would have done it already.

eduardoeae commented on 2011-08-23 20:45

http://pastebin.com/2KJMXpLq
Here is the 0001-bfq patch for 3.0. I just made it from the 2.6.39 patches. I guess its the same as the linux-pf one.
The 0002 and 0003 patches from 2.6.39 works just fine.
It shouldn't have any problems because I only made some syntax fixes.
But I'm testing it right now so... just be cautious about it.

graysky commented on 2011-08-23 20:14

@karabaja4 - dunno how -pf is including it since Paolo hasn't written it yet!

Det commented on 2011-08-23 15:11

@karabaja4, the latest BFQ patches I know of are here: http://algo.ing.unimo.it/people/paolo/disk_sched/patches/2.6.39/

I don't think BFQ is yet updated for 3.0.

karabaja4 commented on 2011-08-23 10:59

Has BFQ been ported to kernel 3.0? Because I'm unable to see it anywhere, yet linux-pf 3.0 seems to have it included somehow...