Search Criteria
Package Base Details: linux-ck
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Submitter: | graysky |
Maintainer: | graysky |
Last Packager: | graysky |
Votes: | 460 |
Popularity: | 0.67 |
First Submitted: | 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-05-08 19:04 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 305 Next › Last »
graysky commented on 2022-09-29 15:21 (UTC)
I am unfamiliar with dkms... can you test your idea about enabling the debug stuff using linux-ck's config and report back?
artafinde commented on 2022-09-29 14:38 (UTC)
@air-g4p I'm able to install
linux-ck
andzfs-dkms
without issues, modules generating without errors. Have you tried building those packages in clean chroot?air-g4p commented on 2022-09-29 13:46 (UTC)
@graysky - I have tried my best to make it easy for you to track down the root cause of why I am seeing 100% 'dkms install' failures on two significantly different Optimus laptops. Both laptops were fully updated, and rebooted, prior to compiling linux-ck 5.19.12-1 - and both built without error.
Installation failure of the required dkms modules is the issue.
My old laptop is an i5 and is 12+ years old - and still runs perfectly. The relevant 'dkms install' make.logs and installation run output are here: http://ix.io/4bN9
My more modern laptop is an i7 and is 2+ years old. The relevant 'dkms install' make.logs and installation run output for it are here: http://ix.io/4bMJ
As you will see that equates to 7 out of 7 'dkms install' module failures.
You should/will also note that
resolve_btfids
is involved in every failure.I've been discussing these multiple 'dkms install' module failures with several people on #archlinux.
One of these fine gentlemen has speculated that these failures may be caused by CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y (which I know for a fact is enabled in the default linux-ck kernel configs), but that one of its dependencies is incorrectly set, possibly causing the 'dkms install' failures.
If you believe that may be a potential cause of these multiple failures, please review:
https://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/DEBUG_INFO_BTF.html
and
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/lib/Kconfig.debug - see Line 339
which show the required, correct dependencies.
Also, as I stated earlier, these exact same dkms modules ALL install without issue against: linux, linux-zen and linux-hardened.
Please advise - it's extremely frustrating, particularly after running linux-ck for many years.
Cheers
air-g4p commented on 2022-09-26 09:05 (UTC) (edited on 2022-09-26 13:51 (UTC) by air-g4p)
@artafinde - Thank you for your follow-up.
The dkms.conf content for each of the 3 failing modules is here: http://ix.io/4bt5
artafinde commented on 2022-09-26 08:24 (UTC)
air-g4p this is not installed, see [here]. I think maybe the DKMS modules are old and not updated for latest kernels? Can you share a dkms.conf from /usr/src/<pkg-name>-<pkgver>/dkms.conf for one of them which fail?
The difference with the linux, linux-zen and linux-hardening is that these are build with Debug and stripped after which requires a stupendous amound of RAM :D
here: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=linux-ck#n276
air-g4p commented on 2022-09-26 08:09 (UTC) (edited on 2022-09-26 08:52 (UTC) by air-g4p)
@graysky - I built linux-ck 5.19.11-1 without error yesterday. However, all three of my dkms modules {bbswitch, nvidia-390xx and vboxhost} are failing to
dkms install
.The relevant make.log files are here: http://ix.io/4bsR
Is there some set of kernel configs I need to be manually configuring prior to compilation?
Also note those same three modules
dkms install
without error against: linux, linux-zen and linux-hardened.Any insights appreciated - Cheers
simona commented on 2022-09-09 07:46 (UTC)
mmm we tried ... but it seems a bit "boring" as a system to use for each of the dozens of aurs installed. anyway thanks. I will follow the advice.
artafinde commented on 2022-09-09 07:42 (UTC)
@simona - no
yay
doesn't build within a clean chroot. I'd suggest installdevtools
from official repos and useextra-x86_64-build
to build this package as it has no other dependency from AUR. See more on the wiki 1simona commented on 2022-09-09 07:37 (UTC)
@artafinde I have a question: what exactly is meant by clean chroot? the one used by yay for example isn't it already a clean chroot? when i use yay on aur i see some writing referring to a certain chroot ... isn't that?
artafinde commented on 2022-09-09 07:20 (UTC)
@simona i find it very easy and without issues to build in a clean chroot environment.
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 305 Next › Last »