AUR (en) - linux-ck

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Submitter:	graysky
Maintainer:	graysky
Last Packager:	graysky
Votes:	460
Popularity:	0.76
First Submitted:	2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2024-04-27 20:16 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 .. 305 Next › Last »

Det commented on 2011-11-02 08:06 (UTC)

He didn't mean this one but it just made my day so: http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/linux&id=e96a97fdb8e5f15406447259559a728f8f480aa0

graysky commented on 2011-11-01 22:33 (UTC)

@morfeo - What?

robertfoster commented on 2011-11-01 22:28 (UTC)

please use also the negative channel fix for aircrack

graysky commented on 2011-10-31 10:39 (UTC)

For those wondering, I have the new PKGBUILD and files all set for the 3.1 release. Paolo has finished BFQ for 3.1 so just waiting on ck to port bfs to 3.1. Other related packages are ready to release as well.

graysky commented on 2011-10-25 23:40 (UTC)

ack - should also mention that BFQ does not apply to the 3.1 tree either.

graysky commented on 2011-10-25 19:30 (UTC)

@skyd - thanks. updated the wiki (feel free to do it yourself in the future).

graysky commented on 2011-10-25 18:54 (UTC)

I know 3.1 is out but the current bfs doesn't patch into the 3.1 tree. I emailed ck.

skydrome commented on 2011-10-25 04:32 (UTC)

ok well i can confirm that gcc's option -march and -mtune's native target goes to atom with this N270 cpu. So perhaps the reason for that capital NOT in the wiki is not needed now.. the kernel works perfectly

graysky commented on 2011-10-24 21:29 (UTC)

@sky - you can go ahead and try it... my understanding from another user who did was that the system would not boot into that kernel. If you have a 2nd kernel installed, go ahead and try. Otherwise, I would use the generic kernel.

skydrome commented on 2011-10-24 20:47 (UTC)

Intel Atom platform specific optimizations (Atoms 3xx/4xx/5xx) - NOT 2xx! I have an Atom N270, does this mean i would opt to use the pentm or p4 packages? or am i limited to the generic? Also, what is the difference in the atom 2xx versions that makes this unsuitable to be used?